Ongoing persecution of Felicity Lowde by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne ('Rachel North'), celebrities and celebrity journalists
This page is updated in July 2026.
Before you start reading, a booster for a page dedicated to fundraising for Felicity Jane Lowde which has been put up to help her take her case against the corrupt rogue journalist Piers Morgan and his associate editorials in the London based press and media, to the High Court at central London in the Royal Courts of Justice.
You can help stop Piers Morgan's campaign to prevent people getting justice in respect of his unlawful acts and crimes.
The Go Fund Me address here:
https://gofund.me/440a489d
A separate page on this blog, though it may not be visible in the blog archives yet, is created uniquely to list the abusive behaviours of Katie Hopkins towards Felicity. The expose on Katie Hopkins' activity takes up too much space on this page.
This page, like the main page on this blog here, is posted on the Internet has helpfully served as a protective fence against the worst that the abusive people described in this blog constantly inflict.
When there is a miscarriage of Justice, such as the 2007 one Felicity Jane Lowde suffered on account of the false accusations of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (pen name 'Rachel North'), there are often people who prey on the vulnerable miscarriage of justice victims for a long time afterward, including the original perpetrators of the miscarriage of justice.
Via this link you can read about Felicity Jane Lowde's 2007 court case and the miscarriage of justice she suffered on account of the malice of false accuser Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and that woman's abusive press and media contacts.
In 2007, during the miscarriage of justice Felicity endured (described in the pages linked above), Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (pen/Internet name 'Rachel North') organised burglaries of Felicity's home, then a small house in Cutteslowe, Oxford, at 53, Jackson Road, Oxford OX2 7TS.
The burglaries were conducted by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne herself, her brother Andrew McFadyen, a man named Daniel James Hart, and other thugs directed by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, including corrupt and immoral detectives whom she paid. These detectives took numerous photographs of Felicity's personal life record and associated sensitive material. Among the photos taken by the corrupt detectives were photos of Felicity's parents' photograph albums (photos containing records of Felicity's childhood family) and Felicity's personal life record photos.
Items stolen from Felicity's home at that time constitute: boxes of sensitive material relating to previous court cases, valuables and designer clothing, new designer bedding in boxes, poor quality copies of photographs in Felicity ’s parents photographs albums, numerous personal private documents belonging to Felicity, coats, an expensive stereo, various miscellany pertaining to Felicity Lowde’s personal life, other papers, art work, etc.
Since 2007, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has preyed on Felicity Lowde’s vulnerable situation. For twenty years, she has continually tried to steal Felicity's creative History of Art research and case story work. Simultaneously, she has been trying discredit the true story of Felicity's life and her childhood family's life. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has hacked into Felicity's telephones and computers for about twenty years in order to further her goals.
Felicity has retained her parents original photograph albums and numerous other original materials from her childhood.
Felicity has transposed lots of her parents' original photographs, her own childhood photographs and associated material onto her personal Flickr photography page. For her readers' enjoyment, and also to set the record straight in respect of her childhood and family record.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (pen name 'Rachel North') is ruthlessly greedy for money and status. For about twenty years, she has been helping herself to photos of Felicity's private belongings that she unlawfully obtained (particularly photos that she took/got a detective to take of photographs and sensitive material that she found at Felicity's home). She uses them to create a false story about herself, her family and her life. She uses them to present herself as a part of the story they tell (which of course she isn't). She uses them to insert herself into Felicity's creative historical case work and history of art work while claiming to be descended from lost royalty (Felicity has found stories about lost royalty and their descendants during the course of her history and history of art research).
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne also uses her copies of Felicity's and her family's photographs and the sensitive material that she stole from Felicity's home to try to discredit Felicity's true comment about her genuine life story. Felicity's evidence based, genuine comment about her life story and background doesn't fit with the malicious libellous rampage that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne went on against her in 2007.
For a long time now, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (pen name 'Rachel North'), her brother Andrew McFadyen, Daniel James Hart and others involved with them, have been distributing the unlawfully obtained copies of Felicity's parents' photographs and her photographs around. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has tended to distribute her copies to select celebrities whose attention she obtains by promoting herself as a survivor of the 7/7 bombings (she is a fake survivor).
Unfortunately, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne was able to get the attention she is constantly seeking from a small crowd of self serving celebrities or self titled 'celebrity journalists', either in the short term or the long term, and these people are described on this page. She took these celebrities for fools, but in following her unquestioningly they asked for her abuse. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has been continually giving celebrities of her choice the copies of Felicity's and her family's photographs and the sensitive material that she stole from Felicity's home, while making false claims about them.
Over the past around twenty years has been acted by a variety of thugs whom Rachel McFadyen/Osborne recruits to her side in order to get them to do some of her dirty work. Such as very abusive Internet users titled 'Unity' and 'Davide Simonetti', Paul Staines (Guido Fawkes) and Ian Dale. 'Unity' runs a malicious website titled 'Ministry of Truth' (Ministry of Lies) where he abuses Felicity with malicious, entirely false claims about her.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne is also responsible for people who have profiteered fro her press and media rampage against Felicity in order to cimmit crimes against her. For example, two other people who burgled Felicity's home: Eve Holding and Sean Skinner, of Skinner Fencing in Wantage, Oxfordshire. This couple maliciously went to the press about Felicity in 2007, contributing to the abusive press and media rampage against her. Eve Holding and Sean Skinner sought to make use of Felicity Lowde’s 2007 troubles to extort money from Felicity that she did not owe, using the Oxford Mail as a vehicle for their bullying. The Skinner Fencing couple persecuted Felicity for a long time at aroubd. this time. Eve Holding’s tactics include threatening to drive a bulldozer through Felicity’s garden fencing (in Oxford), threatening to empty bulldozers’ debri into the garden over her fence, threatening to remove fences around Felicity’s property (then in Oxford), making false allegations in a county court (again to try to extort money), and making scenes in the street. In 2001, publicity seeker Eve Holding was evicted from the reality TV program Survivor for stealing.
Felicity supports the civilians and children of Gaza, who have experienced genocide committed by the government and army of Israel. For nearly two decades Felicity has supported the people of Palestine against the horrors inflicted upon them by the genocide-accused state of Israel.
Felicity is a genuine church going christian.
On all British birth certificates there is printed the following warning:
A screenshot of Felicity Lowde's genuine personal Flickr photography page:
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne is not connected in any way, shape or form to the people who feature in Felicity's Flickr photography page. She is not connected in any way, shape or form to the people who feature in Felicity's creative research work.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, pen name 'Rachel North' has contacted a number of celebrities described on this page, while and falsely claiming a number things. She has spent a lot of her time goading them into joining in with her abuse of Felicity, and frauds and her personal and financial ambitions.
Over the past decade or so, while soliciting the attention of the celebrities described on this page and profiteering from her media status as 'bomb survivor' (which she isn't), Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (pen name 'Rachel North') has falsely claimed that:
1. she is related to people in historical and modern photographs who appear on Felicity Lowde's Flickr photography page, and Felicity isn't.
2. she is a descendant of lost royalty.
3. she is a descendant of royalty who feature in Felicity Lowde's creative history and history of art research work and in numerous historical paintings within that work.
4. In 2006, Felicity knew about her being connected to her parents' and her own personal photographs and has been deliberately denying her her true identity ever since.
5. In 2006, Felicity knew about her being connected to royalty and historical paintings and has been deliberately denying her access to her true identity ever since.
5. In 2006, Felicity tried to crush her claims about her personal life and about her being a royal descendant by whispering to her about files at Special Branch which relate to her and telling her to shut up about them.
6. Felicity is somehow in league with Donald Trump's administration who have been hacking into her (Rachel Fadyen's) phone and computers.
7. lost royals are secretly buried at Norwich Cathedral and her father the Canon McFadyen knows all about them.
8. her story merits being filmed at a major film studio starring A-List celebrities. Which would also compensate for her 2007 book 'Out of the Tunnel' having failed dismally. (Rachel put up notices about film rights for her book on her blog in 2007: nothing ever came of it however).
There appear to be no historical Special Branch police files which mention Rachel McFadyen Obsborne's family (pages of these files were published by Felicity on one of her now private blogs for three years). Felicity, who is the only person who has has access to these files, certainly never saw any. According to Felicity and to witnesses to her life, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has never been anything to do with Felicity's creative history and History of Art research either. She still isn't anything to do with it. There is no connection between Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and Felicity's parents photographs or Felicity's personal lifetime photographs. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's fabrications against Felicity and her life and work are a sick fantasy. One that she assumes she can get away with, having got away with so much abuse already in her life.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (pen name 'Rachel North'), who is unemployed, now living on the Cayman Islands, spends a great deal of time continuing to stalking and harass Felicity while trying to interfere with her life any which way she can. She demonstrates a complete inability to leave Felicity alone. She obsessionally hates Felicity and preys upon her life incessantly.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne invented the concept of referring to other people in malicious, unsubtle coded terms on her social media pages, via imagery or in handwriting. She has practised this nastiness for ages, over twenty years, often directing this behaviour at Felicity. Spiteful in mind, she frequently uses this form of behaviour to attack Felicity, undermine her and try to set herself above her.
It seems appropriate to list the celebrities who have been taken in by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne in the order of the extent they have been a malicious criminal trouble and nuisance to Felicity.
When reading about the celebrities on this page, bear in mind that, guided by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne they have all been worse than a dreadful nuisance to Felicity. They have all taken up Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's claim that Felicity's personal property, including her parents' photographs and her own photographs, is nothing but a a curiosity that she owns that is open to whichever claimant can prove that he or she is related to the people in them, related simultaneously to royalty and related simultaneously to herself, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. At times the celebrities have competed against one another while attempting to prove that they have the best (fraudulent) ancestral claims in this context.
Rachel McFadyen's (false) claim to be a '7/7 bomb survivor' seems to have served the celebrities as a failsafe insurance against proper scrutiny of their nonsense inspired by her.
Before 2022, Felicity's parents' photographs containing images of Felicity's childhood were not on Felicity's Flickr photography account. Felicity started uploading these photographs onto her Flickr page in 2022. (Felicity's parents' photographs that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne took copies of while conducting burglaries on Felicity's home)
All of the celebrities that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has recruited into her campaign against Felicity between 2007 and 2026 were vaunting knowledge of the appearance of the photographs in Felicity's parents' photograph albums well before 2022. They were showing this knowledge of the appearance of the photographs from at least 2012 onwards. As she became aware of what was happening in respect of the photographs, Felicity knew the original photographs were still in her possession, in her parents' photograph albums. The photograph copies used and distributed by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne had to have been unlawfully taken from Felicity's home at 53, Jackson Road, Oxford at some point between March 2007 and 2008, during the course of a burglary/burglaries on her home. Neither Rachel McFadyen/Osborne nor anyone she's been in contact with were given copies of the photographs or any of the sensitive items in Felicity's home by any members of Felicity's family.
For the benefit of the celebrities she has recruited into her campaign, (and with her hangers on who also attack Felicity) Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has, over many years, consistently tried passing Felicity’s Flickr photography account off as belonging to hers, falsely claiming that it was always hers while shared with celebrities of her choice. She has been falsely claiming that content featuring there is related to her life in some way. In fact Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has never had access to Felicity’s Flickr photography account (and nor do any celebrities associated to her) because Flickr account security is very strict, extra strict. The only person who has ever accessed Felicity’s Flickr photography account is its owner Felicity, who left it without update for about a decade between 2007 and 2018. At one stage (and up until 2024) there was, on Felicity's Flickr photography accounty, a photo of a woman who slightly resembles Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. (An Australian lady, a relation of Felicity's son's wife). With the celebrities, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne sought to make use of this photo to pretend that it was of herself. She kept this up until it was pointed out that the woman in the photograph was clearly in Australia when the photograph was taken, at a time when Eachel McFadyen/Osborne was definitely not.
One of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's ploys in respect of her continuous attempts to steal Felicity's life story, personal belongings and creative work is to connect the bombing of the underground train between Kings Cross and Russell Square in London UK on 7/7 2005 to statements made in historical art work. For example, if a personality comes up in a part of the case story that Felicity is looking at, and this historical person lived at Russell Square at one point, and this area is painted by a famous artist, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne will state that she is relevant to that art work, "being a survivor of the 7/7 bombings". Rachel's scam reasoning being that the 7/7 2005 London bombers knew all about Rachel being a lost aristocrat/member of royalty at the time of the 7/7 bombings, which is why the bombings happened. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's continuous scam about the 7/7 2005 bombings and her attempt to milk the incident for everything she can get is phenomenal.
Hugh Grant
A first celebrity to mention is the actor Hugh Grant, who after being solicited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has been able to influence numerous celebrities on her behalf. Although he may seem a surprising first to some, he has demonstrated that he is totally in thrall to Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's continuous lies. He is the one with the most influence, and he has been consistently validating Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's fraudulent campaigns. We surmise that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne approached Hugh Grant early on after 2007, and continued in regular contact with him in 2012 when he was busy with his investigations into the practise of stalking and hacking in the corrupt British press and media.
In Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's mind, Hugh Grant was the ideal shield from correct allegations against her about her stalking and potential outspoken correct allegations against her about her and hacking people's phones and computers. She effortfully recruited him to her side early on.
Hugh Grant, as a guarantor of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's (non existent) integrity, has strongly influenced and encouraged all the celebrities on this page into supporting her.
We believe that the reason Rachel McFadyen/Osborne was able to take Hugh Grant for a fool is because a) she claimed a supreme victim status as a 'rape survivor' and a 'bomb survivor' and offered to use it to help him promote his 'Hacked Off' enterprise and b) she flaunted her videos of her domestic pole dancing to him, creating home made pole dancing scenes relating to Felicity's creative research work and sending them his way via her Instagram page 'Tropical Vertical'.
For a while, up until Felicity took some legal action (which Hugh Grant paid for in solicitors fees although the case was discontinued by her), Hugh Grant was preoccupied with trying to pass Felicity's personal family records (Felicity's parents' photographs featuring Felicity'd childhood, Felicity's own lifetime photos photos and Felicity's sensitive documents), as well as Felicity's ancestry and creative work off as relating to himself, continually appropriating them for the purpose of false claims about himself in the way that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne was also doing. Insomuch, he quickly became part of an obsessive fraud and intimidation campaign against Felicity headed by Rachel McF adyen/Osborne.
Hugh Grant's parallel abuse of Felicity, influenced by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, has been dreadful to observe.
About scripts people present to him, Hugh Grant has frequently made such statements as 'I don't care if its true, as long as it makes a good film', etc. His attitude type has been fertile ground for the scams put in place by the avaricious Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and her brother Andrew.
A picture of the actor Hugh Grant:
In an example Hugh Grant's behaviour described here, we display a photoshoot he engaged in for the New York Times in 2024, while in the USA, in which he poses as portraits of people who feature in paintings that Felicity has used in the context of her creative esearch work and that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has specifically selected in the promotion of her scam against Felicity. We know that Hugh Grant rarely engages in any artistic work without bossing everyone around and that it is very likely he directed the NYT photoshoot.
Just one example of Hugh Grant's behaviours in the above.
A list celebrity Hugh Grants' behaviour has vastly encouraged Rachel McFadyen/Orborne and Andrew McFadyen who to this day, continue with their campaigns against Felicity like dogs with bones, refusing to let it go. Hugh Grant made them rash promises and gave them a 'shot in the arm' and they are still high on it, even though there's no hope for theirs and their acquaintances' delusional film plans now.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and her brother Andrew McFadyen are clearly very tenacious stalkers and hackers with ingrained personality disorders in respect of the same, who do not cease their very destructive behaviours unless lawfully forced to.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and her brother Andrew McFadyen are very obsessed with promoting Rachel's pole dancing, which they appear to consider a route to celebrity life for both of them. Over the pst twenty years they have incessantly flogged it to various celebrities, using it as a means of plagiarising Felicity's creative work and promoting themselves. Even though Rachel is now entering her late fifties complete with serious crows feet wrinkles on her face, the McFadyen siblings continue their flog. They don't seem to care that this very pole dancing exhibition demonstrates that Rachel is a liar who was obviously not on the train that was bombed on 7/7 2026. Her muscles have never suffered any shock and she doesn't have a mark or scratch anywhere on her body.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's pole dancing is domestic, and repetitive. She pole dances on a pole in her bedroom on the Cayman Island and publishes videos of it on her Instagram page. Her polle dancing scenes very frequently feature imagry plagiarism of themes in Felicity's creative research work, Felicity's photographs and Felicity's family photographs. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne is not a professional pol dancing contender. She isn't pretty. She's very flat chested. Her pole dancing activity is not nearly enough to get her a place in film or fame.
The photos on Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's Instagram pages below are from 2007 -2010.
Many of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's videos consist of intruding upon or falsifying Felicity's life story, and plagiarising her creative work (though dance story and imagery). One of these videos, the one featuring the broomstick, very plainly has nothing to do with Felicity who is a Christian, however. This 'broomstick video' is a direct appeal to the author J K Rowling, who has a great deal of more money than sense.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne as she appears in 2026, below.
Under Hugh Grant's influence, the celebrities/well known personalities recruited into Rachel McFadyen's scam by her (and as time went on, by celebrities associated to these celebrities) are very persistent in their abuse of Felicity Lowde’s Human Rights. Their particular brand of identity theft, instigated and encouraged by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, seems to bond them all together. Up until very recently they have all seemed very determined to falsify every aspect of Felicity‘s identity and her background.
The actor Hugh Grant covets the themes in Felicity ’s copyright creative History of Art research work and historical case study in an egotistical way. Hugh Grant is often motivated by an insatiable greed for more and more social status and money and diverse forms of it. People who appeal to his social snobbery (for example, to his hatred for defendants who go through the justice system whatever their real circumstances) are able to take him for a fool.
Hugh Grant has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. He has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. He has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. He has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home during burglaries. He has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Piers Morgan
Felicity would never have anything to do with Piers Morgan, the corrupt rogue journalist who has spent his so-called professional life hacking into people's phones and computer equipment. In most people's opinion, Piers Morgan should be in jail doing time for his hacking crimes against the innocent.
Piers Morgan is a so-called media mogul well known for preying on vulnerable people; his frauds, his theft, his blackmail of various people including the innocent, his falsehoods, his racist obsessions and his campaigns of harassment and abuse are notorious. A chip on his shoulder larger than a mountain, envious of everyone in the socialite life he often meets, he strives to prove he is someone special by way of his gross self vaunting and his false claims. In the course of his perverse press and media activity Piers Morgan has been distorting and stealing aspects of Felicity’s creative work . He exploits the distributed stolen copies of Felicity’s parents’ photograph album photographs in order to do so.
Piers Morgan is nothing to do with Felicity’s parents' photograph albums, he is a liar. He’s nothing to do with Felicity’s creative History of Art research work, either.
Piers Morgan is the son of a dentist in County Offally who died in a car crash when he was one years old while his aggrieved mother took to drink. There is no aristocracy in his family or ancestry.
Piers Morgan is a compulsive, experienced and devoted fraudster.
An article here titled Dial M for Morgan states:
'WHEN HE appeared on Desert Island Discs in 2009, Piers Morgan was challenged about phone hacking. Presenter Kirsty Young asked him about dealing with people who listened to phone messages. “People who tap people’s phones … how did you feel about that?” Morgan didn’t deny the allegation:“I’m quite happy … to have to sit here defending all these things I used to get up to …” ..“I make no pretence about the stuff we used to do.” But after the revelation in July 2011 that Rupert Murdoch’s journalists had hacked murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler’s mobile phone, he changed his tune’.
It is thought that during his time at the Daily Mirror, Piers Morgan hacked numerous phones, and that a conviction and sentencing in a criminal court in relation to this activity of his is long overdue. Article: Piers Morgan “must have known” about Daily Mirror phone hacking, say lawyers. ‘Piers Morgan “must have had knowledge of voicemail interception” and other unlawful information gathering techniques when he was editor of the Daily Mirror, it has been claimed at the high court’. ‘Lawyers acting for alleged phone hacking victims made the accusation while seeking financial records relating to Morgan’s time in charge of the newspaper in the early 2000s. They claim illegal techniques were used by individuals working for the Mirror during Morgan’s time as editor’.. ‘ In order to prove the accusations, the lawyers are seeking disclosure of what payments to private investigators, if any, were signed off by Morgan and Neil Wallis, the editor of sister title the Sunday People. Although it is more than 15 years since the start of the phone hacking scandal, which led to the closure of Rupert Murdoch’s News of the World, cases continue to make their way through the court system. Dozens of individuals, including the Duke of Sussex, are still filing new claims. Murdoch’s News UK and Reach, the publisher of the Mirror, have collectively paid out hundreds of millions of pounds in damages and costs since 2006’.
Piers Morgan infamously tuned in to messages hacked from the voice mail of Millie Dowler, a murdered schoolgirl, by his own admission. Piers Morgan refuses to admit supervising the hacking of the murdered girl’s phone, although the case is obvious. The hacking of this girl’s phone caused distraction in the related police murder investigation in her respect. Investigations into the despicable hacking of Millie Dowler were also covered extensively by the Irish press.
Piers Morgan was sacked from the Daily Mirror for deceitfully publishing false pictures of Iraqi soldiers being tortured by British soldiers on the front pages. During the Iraq war, Piers Morgan fabricated a Daily Mirror front page photo to get a “scoop.” Nobody wanted his false evidence. He is widely reputed as a fraud and a liar who treats current affairs (and anything else he can) as a self publicity bandwagon.
In 2007 Rachel McFadyen/Osborne liaised extensively with The Sun Newspaper, The Daily Mail Newspaper and The Daily Mail in her attacks on Felicity, using their press and media outlets to defame, harass and abuse Felicity. Rachel wrote articles for the Daily Mail which were (still are) replete with extremely malicious false allegations. At this stage in her life she was in regular contact with Piers Morgan.
Piers Morgan has frequently advertised that he feels he is supported by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne in all that he does in the context of an obsessional fraud and hate campaign that he conducts against Felicity, often while using his most notoriously corrupt and abusive press and media contacts to assist him in his perverse goals.
For many years, notorious rogue journalist Piers Morgan has constantly schemed to steal Felicity's creative work and family record and falsify and distort them to his own advantage. Having been given copies of photos of Felicity's parents photographs and photos of her personal photographs by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, he has sought to profit from Felicity's social vulnerability as a miscarriage victim to make false claims about his own personal life and ancestry, falsely claiming that he is a lost aristocrat and royal descendant "just like Rachel McFadyen/Osborne".
Felicity would never have anything to do with this disgusting immoral man.
In February 2025, Piers Morgan was filmed discusing the Israel Palestine conflict with Tucker Carlson, during which time he said that killing women in children in Gaza, Palestine could be seen a moral right. His statement contradicts the International Criminal Court at the Hague which has charged Israel with Genocide via applications from numerous countries, and in contradiction to statements from Amnesty International.
As numerous people have been pointing out for some time, Piers Morgan may be at some stage be charged with the crime of Incitement to Genocide of the Gaza Palestinians. He is also liable to be charged with Complicity in genocide of the Palestinians in many people's expressed opinion. He is on record as frequently advocating the genocide of the Palestinians.
From the article 'Piers Morgan and the Justification of genocide in Gaza; no debate, just complicity.'
Piers Morgan has been accused of being an invasive door-stepper, responsible for hacking people’s phones and supervising extensive criminal activity in respect of the same. There is evidence of Piers Morgan stalking members of Felicity’s family.
Piers Morgan is known to have lied at the Leveson Inquiry.
Piers Morgan engages in continuous malicious harassment of Felicity. We believe that he is disposed to malicious harass and pester women who express rejection of him.
A bizarre snob, Piers Morgan develops aggressive obsessions about women who tell him they want nothing to do with him, a famous case study being his dreadful obsession with Prince Harry's wife Meghan Markle. Clearly, Piers Morgan has a sexual obsession with Meghan Markle, while continually subjecting her to racist attacks. Piers Morgan’s racist attacks on Meghan Markle seem to be a part of a campaign he conducts against her ever since she rejected him and “ghosted” him. However, his harassment of women is not limited women that he racially abuses. He engages in all kinds of abusive harassment towards women.
Piers Morgan was paid a negotiated sum of £30M by Rupert Murdoch for what was going to be a five year slot on an awful show named ‘Piers Morgan Uncensored’. The show 'Piers Morgan Uncensored' was first hosted by TalkTV. It was owned by Rupert Murdoch and News International who invested a vast amount in getting it off the ground to no avail. Now it is on YouTube, managed by Piers Morgan’s media company Insider Productions Ltd.
During the spate of publicity occurring before 'Piers Morgan Uncensored' began, press photos of Piers Morgan were frequently seen on bus stop posters and various billboards. On some publicity billboards seen in early 2022, Piers Morgan was seen pointing aggressively, in a threatening manner. During this period, he was pictured making unsubtly coded, often pictorial references based on hijacking’s Felicity’s creative work and her personal and family record.
Although for copyright reasons Piers Morgan is unable to publish a full stolen adaptation of Felicity’s family history and creative work, the types of criminal nuisance and plagiarism he constantly demonstrates are deliberate and very malicious.
The rogue journalist Piers Morgan knows his tabloid business, which often about creating rumour and salacious gossip, and he is constantly trying to start public conversations based on his frauds and false claims. On his TV show 'Piers Morgan Uncensored', and on his ghastly Twitter/X page, Piers Morgan frequently broadcasts (in unsubtle, coded terms) his false ideas about Felicity’s creative work which he can’t seem to leave alone or stop trying to distort to his advantage. Since the show ‘Piers Morgan Uncensored’ began, Piers Morgan has spent every single episode making hints and coded allusions to false stories about his ancestry distorted storylines of Felicity’s creative work.
Piers Morgan proves that he is unable to cease his stalking activity and requires a court order to force him to cease.
Piers Morgan is clearly trying to steal aspects of Felicity’s creative work in order to try to promote himself as a long lost aristocrat. There are serious concerns that this is yet another way of him stalking Meghan Markle, an activity he seems unable to cease. He is trying to look as if he’s a better aristocrat than Harry. The reality is, Piers Morgan is not an aristocrat at all, he’s simply a sad fraudster.
Piers Morgan often expressly conflates Felicity’s claims about his disgusting behaviour with Meghan Markle’s claims about his disgusting behaviour and depricates these claims in order to harass both women simultaneously. In referencing one woman, he makes a subtle allusion to or insinuation about the other.
Many Twitter/X users have given indication (by way of tweets) of what they think about Piers Morgan’s stalking personality e.g. here:
Into his various scams and despicable ventures Piers Morgan often drags his son, Spencer Morgan, who seems to be prepared to vaunt any vile behaviour of his father’s in exchange for money he’s plied with by said. A case of ‘the bank of Dad’.
Select comments on Piers Morgan here. Piers Morgan’s ‘Piers Morgan Uncensored’ show has largely slumped and flopped in the ratings with 80% of those who tuned in gone after the first episode. ‘Piers Morgan Uncensored’ show audience figures show few ever bothered to watch him, certainly nobody sensible ever did.
Piers Morgan’s ratings disaster has been known everywhere for a long time, plenty of tweets here.
Social media commenters are often highlighting Piers Morgan’s close affiliation with people who are doing jail time for organising pedophile networks. (None of the X posts/Tweets posted below were published by ourselves or by Felicity or by anyone we know. They are public opinion).
Piers Morgan’s obsession with distorting his own family story and his ancestry story may derive from a sense of shame he has developed about is own life.
Piers Morgan’s stalker habits are often mocked by his readers, in their tweets and in their elaborate pictures. Some examples here (posters unknown to us or to Felicity).
Into his schemes, his fraud and his dishonesty, Piers Morgan frequently escorts his ‘enabler’ wife, Celia Morgan nee Celia Walden. Celia Walden is a celebrity journalist and crime writer who shields her villainous husband. On his social media pages Piers Morgan often promotes his wife Celia Morgan’s worthless books and links her to his frauds and scams.
A photograph of Piers Morgan with his wife Celia Walden.
Piers Morgan has, over the past two years, been keen to showcase photos of himself posing with Paul McCartney in times past, as per his tweet below.
Piers Morgan is a parasite on the media, and on society. Article: Piers Morgan branded 'An empty parasite'. Article: Piers Morgan branded ’empty parasite’ and ‘talking head sewage’. Article: Piers Morgan an empty headed parasite.
The elderly Beatles star Paul McCartney was a great singer songwriter whose lifelong personal reputation is not so good. He is thought to have spent much of his life a shill. Stella McCartney’s designer clothing is renowned to be awful.
Hugh Grant and Piers Morgan have spend considerable time vying for first place in Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's favour in the context of her scam attacks against Felicity. They have each vaunted displays seeking Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's approval and attention and boasting about getting it.
Piers Morgan has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. He has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. He has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. He has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. He has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Sir Alan Sugar of the TV game The Apprentice which launched the malicious Katie Hopkins on the world is another member of the group of celebrity fraudsters. Sir Alan Sugar is constantly vying with Piers Morgan over who can be the best con artist in respect of various matters related to Felicity’s creative work, her life story and her parents’ photographs. There is in fact no French, Scottish, English or Irish aristocracy in Sir Alan Sugar’s background. There is no connection between himself and Felicity, nor between himself and Felicity’s parents’ photograph albums. Sir Alan Sugar’s wife and family are nothing to do with it either.
Rachel Riley and Tracy Oberman
According to published news, Rachel Riley, on false premises, obtained a temporary civil court order against Felicity on the 07/08/2025, which Felicity is taking to the Court of Appeal, so out of respect for this state of affairs we don't make any new comment about her here, save for correction for the sake of clarity and spelling correction. In the event, the comment already on this blog is extensive and informative, good enough for any genuine and honest legal representative to analyse in their context appropriately.
Two images (below) portraying the terrible state of Gaza during the genocide committed by Israel.
Up and coming genuine journalist Bisan Owda recently published a video she and he small crew made titled 'Orphans of Gaza', featuring a small boy whose parents were shot in front of him by Israel's army which calls itself the IDF (Israel Defence Forces, socalled). People from Gaza, Palestine, call the army the IOF (the Israel Occupation Forces).
Rachel Riley is a minor celebrity of Jewish (mother) and Irish-English (father) descent . She has no Jewish or other form of religious education and professes herself an aetheist. There is no French, English, Scottish or Irish aristocratic ancestry in Rachel Riley's ancestry as it happens. Rachel Riley works for Countdown on TV Channel 4, and is close with the celebrity Stephen Fry, due his sometimes involvement with that program.
For around the past five years, trying to move further than her Z-list celebrity job on Countdown (a British quiz show), Rachel Riley saw an opportunity to promote herself through instigating and then stirring up race hate in the problematic matter of Israel's/Palestine's governance.
Prior to her active self appointed role as a malevolent figure inciting racial conflict and hatred, Rachel Riley would garner attention by making lewd, obscene and inappropriate gestures alongside her colleagues on the Countdown program. She has kept on with her lewdness, obscenity and inappropriate gestures to this day.
Rachel Riley's disposition is that of a troublemaking provocateur who preys on people and communities and makes up false stories. In respect of Felicity's creative work and personal property, she is a fraudster, making up false stories. She is nothing to do with Felicity’s creative work or family or ancestry. She is nothing to do with Felicity, who would never support her terrible views and actions about how Israel is justified in attacking Palestine.
Rachel Riley actively supports genocide against the Palestinians and may face the criminal charge of Incitement to Genocide.
Rachel Riley has been spending considerable time maliciously targeting Felicity in an obsessional manner.
Rachel Riley is a renown supporter of the government of Israel. She is widely accused of being a 'narcissist', an 'attention seeker,' a 'racist', an 'egotist' and a 'delusional liar'. She is extremely unpopular on account of these much commented upon aspects to her personality as well as her very apparent racism which is commented on in a whole variety of places.
These petitions are made by a wide variety of the public, and were not instigated by either Felicity or ourselves.
Petitioners (more linked here) are very tired of Rachel Riley’s divisive racism.
There is more discussion on Stephen Fry and his one time fixation on falsifying Felicity’s identity, family record and creative work further down this page.
The Internet is full of people expressing their disgust with Rachel Riley's behaviours.
More X posts/tweets about Rachel Riley made by members of the public here:
Pictures and news bulletins in respect of the Gaza children victims of genocide by Israel may be found in this search bar here.
Rachel Riley systematically refuses to acknowledge Israel's genocide in Gaza and advertises herself supporting books such as 'Israelophobia' which deny Israel's acts of genocide and make remarks encouraging it.Numerous tweeters and social media users have pointed this out.
The hearings against Israel take place at the Peace Palace at the Hague.
Rachel Riley continues to deny that the criminal state of Israel has committed genocide. She continues to advocate for the genocide of the Palestinian people.
The tweet/X post shown below exhibits details about a news program which featured Rachel Riley advocating and supporting genocide of the Palestinians of Gaza.
Rachel Riley comes across as a very self centred and despicable narcissist, eager for publicity.
Pictures and new bulletins in respect of the Gaza children murdered by Israel may be found in this search bar here.
Rachel Riley is commented on by Diarmuid Breatnach is his blog article about her titled 'The Life of Riley is an Egotistical Denial of Humanity'.
Evening Standard article: 'I have a dirty sense of humour! Rachel Riley gets a kick out of spelling rude words on Countdown'.
Express article: 'Rachel Riley causes chaos with words too explicit to air on Countdown'.
Yahoo article: 'Rachel Riley can't hide her smirk as she spells out rude word on Countdown'.
People also find insensitive the way Rachel Riley's very tacky Instagram page is loud, boastful and self vaunting with incessant bright, gawdy colours. On each side of the wall in the Palestine/Israel territory, people are suffering unspeakable tragedy. What is there to celeberate, or keep shrieking with laughter about as rachel Riley does? And what's the inane face pulling for? Rachel Riley is callous.
Observers have expressed that they are very tired of seeing Rachel Riley's support for genocide on British press and media outlets and television screens. (Since this tweet/X post, show below, was published, Channel 4 have taken some disciplinary action against Rachel Riley, while many feel the channel did not take enough action).
Rachel Riley’s aggressively attacks anyone who pities the plight of the civilians of Gaza in Palestine. She notoriously attacks Jewish poets such as Michael Rosen who are against Israel’s genocide on Gaza, for example.
The tweet/X post below was written by a 'Wear Red', a Socialist journal which was ostensibly very tired of Rachel Riley's behaviour. More comment from members of the public.
People who once liked Rachel Riley (before she revealed her true personality) have cut her off due to her genocidal, fascistic attitudes and demonstrative statements in respect of the same.
Observation of Tracy-Ann Oberman's speech given at the rally for the 26th November 2024 march organised by the pro-Israel political group Campaign Against Antisemitism shows her to be a grooming speaker with a very aggressive dictatorial monotone voice. She is focused on fabricating factual evidence and distorting the import of real evidence while working up crowds into seeing themselves as a mistreated and deprived in-group with faulty outside enemies who must be eliminated. Her way of aggressive speaking is seen as a concern by historians in the matter of 1930s and 1940s Austria and Germany. One of the true lessons of 'never again' is of course a correct observation of past times, and 'never again' should apply to anyone, not just people of Jewish ethnicity that Tracy Ann Oberman approves of.
Rachel Riley and Tracy-Ann Oberman often act together.
Rachel Riley's behaviour in this type of matter is classic criminal harassing stalker behaviour. Is is also obvious propaganda spreading behaviour.
Rachel Riley has been extremely aggressive in her attacks on Jeremy Corbyn while he supports the people of Palestine against genocidal attacks on them. She has been so aggressive in her campaign against him, and so abusive in this respect, that she has faced calls to be sacked.
Ostensibly, Rachel Riley would never have been so aggressive towards Jeremy Corbyn had he not been so articulate on the matter of Israel's genocide of Palestinians.
Mark Lewis, a lawyer who has acted extensively for Hugh Grant and some of his companions including Rachel Riley and Tracy-Ann Oberman, is recorded in the media as stating that he has encouraged Rachel Riley and Tracy-Ann Oberman to sue for libel and prosecute for harassment anyone who criticises them.
We would ask people to note that Rachel Riley, on her Instagram page, glaringly publishes and continually vaunts reams and reams of pictures of her whole family including the children, close up and in various outdoor places, at home and out and about. She also incessantly publishes every detail about herself and her family, including all their names. She is very liberal and open with photographic records of her own private life and her children, regularly distributing these to all and sundry in the press and media and on the Internet. Therefore, by Rachel Riley's own standards, there's clearly nothing wrong with commenting on pictures in the public domain that Rachel Riley has herself extensively placed there for comment, or with republishing pictures that she has posed for and her family have posed for which were taken by press photographers, in order to criticise her abusive behaviour.
Rachel Riley's personal immorality is in sinc with her attitude to the poor Palestinians whose plight she encourages while treating them with callous mockery and complete disregard.
Obviously Rachel Riley is free to publicly renounce her racist anti-Palestinian activism any time she wants to (and she never does).
In 2022, Tracy Ann Oberman paid extensive damages for making false antisemitism claims against a professional campaigner against the genocide being committed against the Gaza Palestinians, Dr. Phillip Proudfoot.
In conjunction with Rachel Riley's activity on Countdown, she frequently publishes tweets/X posts with lewd and sexualised references, meanings and inuendo, or odd references directed at various men (with themes that vary, depending on the way she is directing her postings).
Rachel Riley is obviously addicted to widespread publicity she gets from promoting and engaging in group lewdness and obscenity.
Rachel Riley often appeals to Husam Zomlot, the Palestine Ambassador to the UK, to Ralph Fiennes, to Hugh Grant and to Stephen Fry and Lenny Henry, as well as other men mentioned on this page. Sadly these men respond to and interchange with these women on a regular basis. There is absolutely no doubt that their collective and individual behaviour is obscene.
There is also a recent tweet/X posting (below) featuring a reference to a “human chain project” which was published by way of a ‘like’ by Rachel Riley on her Twitter/X page.
This tweet/X post liked by Rachel Riley on her X page is an appeal to Ambassador Husam Zomlot, who used the phrase “let us break our chains” in his speech on the Palestine Solidarity Campaign platform in London on the 13th of January 2024 (just before Rachel Riley posted her referencing in the tweets/X posts shown).
Rachel Riley frequently publishes posts by a fanatical Zionist friend of hers who continually excuses Israel's war crimes and acts of genocide in Gaza. Aviva uses the Twitter/X handle ‘Aviva Klompas’ which Rachel Riley in her lewdness uses as a sexual innuendo (as seen).
The people of Gaza have extensively explained and shown that the so-called 'warnings' (cited by Aviva Klompass in the tweet above) are nothing but a malicious trick designed to get them conveniently into one place in order to brutally bomb it.
Rachel Riley and her associates have no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. They have no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. They have no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which they obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. They have no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. They have no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Rachel Riley frequently approaches the various men mentioned on this page from within the group of celebrities/well known personalities, including the Palestine Ambassador Husam Zomlot, white posting Tweets and X posts in which the name of the Israel Ambassador ‘Tzipi Hotovely’ is included.The name of this Israel ambassador is exploited by Rachel Riley as a reference to the words ‘zip’, ‘hot’ and ‘lovely’ The genocidal Israel Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely has approved and advocated the genocide of tens of thousands of Gaza Palestinians, including over 25,000 children.
Rachel Riley's lewdness and apparent psychopathy on show yet again.
Tzipi Hotovely who is nicknamed 'Ambassador for Genocide', is in the article shown below featuring on a report about a successful UK petition to expell her from the UK for Incitement to Genocide.
In the context of her bizarre sexual referencing to the Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely, Rachel Riley plays on a theme of “kinky sexual shame”. Observe Rachel Riley's lewdness and apparent psychopathy.
The code term that Rachel Riley often uses for “kinky sexual shame” is referencing to ‘shame that should be felt by those committing atrocities and genocide in Gaza.’ Rachel Riley has no morals or sense of responsibility.
Two tweets/X posts published by the Ambassador Husam Zomlot, responding directly to Rachel Riley's Tweets/X posts. He is not the only one to have gotten drawn in by Rachel Riley's behaviour.
Ambassador Husam Zomlot entered the awareness of the group trying to sabotage Felicity very soon after Felicity innocently posted a video of one of his Palestine Solidarity Campaign speeches on her Facebook page having attended a rally in support of the people of Gaza (alongside hundreds of thousands of others from all walks of life, who have a whole variety of social opinions). Although Felicity did not think twice (at first!) about publishing the video (one among many she has published in respect of Palestine), Ambassador Husam Zomlot seems to have subsequently been contacted by members of the abusive group described on this page at that moment.
At no stage has Felicity Lowde invited Husam Zomlot to be a part of her copyright creative work. He is not connected to Felicity’s creative work or her family photographs in any way, shape or form.
Felicity genuinley supports the innocent civilians of Palestine, especially those who suffer so terribly in the Gaza Strip. She has always supported Palestinian civilians and children, and has been a Freedom for Palestine activist for close to twenty years.
Rachel Riley frequently posts on Internet pages representing the unpopular organisation titled Campaign Against Antisemitism, far right political organisation financed by the genocide-accused administration of Israel which denies the holocaust happening to the Palestinians and supports the genocidal attacks on them. Rachel Riley's posts on the page 'Campaign Against Antisemitism' often contain a coded reference to people she knows; her referencing hs at tims merged with sordid appeals to Ambassador Husam Zomlot and others in this manner.
There is no connection between Felicity ’s creative research work and the insalubrious characters who run the abusive group passing as Campaign Against Antisemitism, or its Internet pages. There is no connection between the insalubrious Campaign Against Antisemitism characters and Felicity’s family or her authentic photographs. None whatsoever.
Felicity knows lots of civilian people in Gaza and supports them on a regular basis. She has known lots of civilian people in Gaza for over twenty years.
Most of the time there is nothing wrong with Ambassador Husam Zomlot’s rally speeches in themselves and no innocent, unaware member of the public cheering or applauding them or marking them with love hearts on social media is guilty of contribution to an offence.
JK Rowling
JK Rowling, also known as Joanne Rowling, the writer, demonstrates a pride based obsession with trying to distort Felicity's creative work and falsify Felicity's personal family record. A celebrity recruited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, JK Rowling has much more money than common sense or talent. Guided by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, whom she defends like a rabid dog, she continually attacks the veracity of the true photograph and information sequence on Felicity's Flickr photography page. The only thing that separates this celebrity from awareness that she is behaving like a malicious fraudster is her own conceited opinion of herself.
A persistent and misguided bully by nature, JK Rowling has often demonstrated an obsession with trying to pass Felicity's family records, ancestry and creative work off as both Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's and her own, relying on the photos that Rachel McFadyen Osborne unlawfully took of Felicity's personal belongings (photos and sensitive material) while conducting burglaries on her home in 2007. She also relies on further personal photos and material belonging to Felicity that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has obtained by hacking Felicity's phones and computer equipment. She persistently refers to Felicity's property and exploits it in order to make false claims and tell false storylines.
Over the past five years many public observers have accused JK Rowling of exhibiting signs of mental derangement generally.
It is perfectly obvious that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and her brother Andrew McFadyen approached J K Rowling because she has a great deal of money and film contacts; easily enough, they felt, for all three of them to pull off a fraud history of art and case work storyline together.
JK Rowling was approached by the McFadyen born siblings and by Hugh Grant and Stephen Fry.
A picture of JK Rowling:
JK Rowling, according to many available accounts, is a bully and a fraudster in many walks of life.
Rachel Riley has put herself forward in the press and media to state that the reason JK Rowling has received cticism in respect of her cruelty to the trans minority is because she has spoken out against Jeremy Corbyn. A completely nonsensical claim on Rachel Riley's part, and simultaneously one that reveals that Rachel Riley and JK Rowling esteem themselves to be in the same camp.
The public have professed concern that some of JK Rowling's obscene wealth has been used to finance Israel's genocide of the civilians of Gaza.
JK Rowling has no right to try to steal any aspect of Felicity's creative work or any other copyright material. She has no right to support Rachel Osborne/McFadyen's burglaries of Felicity's home(s), nor her stalking of Felicity, nor her hacking into Felicity's phones and computers.
For over a decade JK Rowling has frequently included unauthorised references to Felicity’s creative History of Art research work, her life and her family in her tweets/X posts and various other media outlets. Unable to steal from Felicity, and full of arrogant anger and bitterness about this, JK Rowling constantly attacks her.
JK Rowling's behaviour is often arrogant and greedy to the point of delusion.
A photograph of Jk Rowling again below.
’Has J K Rowling ever been sued for plagiarism?’
In respect of some of the authors who J K Rowling clearly stole from, it is apparent that these didn’t have the money to complete their cases in court when suing her over it, or they got worn out with her incessant bullying behaviour while suing her, and so they gave up and she got away with it.
Adrian Jacobs sued J K Rowling over her theft from his book Willy the Wizard.
JK Rowling Ripped off Ursula K Le Guin’s book A Wizard of Earthsea to write Harry Potter. J K Rowling has also been accused of stealing from the 1986 movie Troll.
All the authors and publishers cited above via the links (and many more that J K Rowling stole from) must have laughed out loud when they saw photographs of the first Harry Potter book being held up by an abstruse, gawky looking mop haired reject who had written her first manuscripts in her brother in law’s Edinburgh cafe. They should have been more wise. Because from the get go it was very obvious that JK Rowling was unscrupulously writing to make big money a) by stealing every marketable aspect of books already published on her chosen theme by other authors b) by stealing parts of famous classical author’s books in order to create an appearance of authenticity to make her book (or book series) sell.
When writing the Harry Potter books, JK Rowling carefully researched the most marketable aspects of previous children’s/fantasy books and chose a format for her flog.
J K Rowling also stole from JR Tolkien, as many have observed.
Article here: 10 hings JK Rowling totally stole from JR Tolkien.
Goodreads article; JK Rowling totally stole from JR Tolkien.
Some years ago, Felicity pointed out that J K Rowling stole her frst edition train scene from the CS Lewis Narnia book Prince Caspian.
In the context of her attempts to steal Felicity ’s creative research work alongside scammer Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, JK Rowling has promoted numerous fantastical claims such as one about a Joseph Rowling from Whitby in York who she claims to be descended from. She fraudulently invites her associates to adduce that this Joseph Rowling is connected to famous French and Scottish – English aristocratic names apparent in Felicity’s creative work. He isn’t, and neither is she.
There are also the names Charles, George and Abraham Rowling, who are not related to each other. JK Rowling is nothing to do with any of them, either. She is nothing to do with French or English or Scottish aristocracy or its history. Nor is she in any way connected to the Duke of York.
JK Rowling spends a lot of time attempting to solve historical murder mysteries by a) stealing other people’s work, b) suggesting that murderer in the story is a trans, or a cross dresser, or in the alternative, a transgender phobic or cross dresser phobic. This trans murderer or trans persecutor obsession seems, in JK Rowling's manual, to apply to all unsolved murders. Quite literally.
JK Rowling is extremely obsessed with trans people, and with transgender, transvestite or cross dressing people. JK Rowling's obsession with trans people is so entrenched that she projects it onto everything.
One of the trans people who have found themselves the target of JK Rowling’s trans obsessions is Imane Khelif. This trans person has filed criminal charges against JK Rowling in France on account of her obsessive and frenetic cyber bullying. The case is currently with the French Parisian prosecution.
Another trans person who has reported JK Rowling to the police on account of the latter’s obsessions and bullying is India Willoughby.
There have been numerous conversations about why JK Rowling is unhealthily obsessed with transgender, transvestite and cross dressing people. Whatever the precise reason, she cannot let up, despite public figures and the public everywhere denouncing her obsession as inane, vindictive, cruel and crass.
One 'trans person' commented:
Felicity Lowde is nothing to do with the trans community.
Because she wants to steal and distort Felicity's work alongside Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, JK Rowling is focused on strategically targeting Felicity in order to try to crush her. Clearly she has surveyed Felicity's situation (as best she understands it) and constructed a plan of attack on her having asked herself “What can I do to which will cause the most distress and inconvenience to Felicity”?
Like Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, JK Rowling takes a pride in being bitchy and malicious, they both seem to think it's clever and funny. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne frequently boats about 'finger pointing and laughing', frequently sneers at people's physiques, and so on. JK Rowling is often seen taking bitchy pot shots at people in a similar fashion and getting her sorry self despised.
We do not believe that JK Rowling sincerely supports women’s rights and protections in any way, shape or form (contrary to her self publicity). If you are interested in protecting and supporting women you do not a) support people who go on press and media rampages against them that are designed to ruin their lives and break their morale b) support malicious lies about them c) support malicious burglars and hackers d) support convicted make stalkers and convicted male domestic abusers e) hoard and boast about obscene amounts of money while crowds of women are struggling in the law courts f) calculatingly thieve from creative women on a continuous basis g) falsify and distort other womens' family records g) besiege other women’s lives with taunting and bitchy finger-pointing.
JK Rowling has a few journalists from the worldwide press defending her still, although she has lost almost all worldwide press and media support (which as every high profile celebrity author knows is a major deal). One media outlet (ostensibly the only one in the UK these days) who still clings to her skirts is The Spectator, whose journalists share her enthusiasm for spite, theft, plagiarism and snide and surreptitious falsehoods. For a scattering of far-right toady journalists who work for this rag – and they are probably on a retainer for it – she can do no wrong. Most newspaper headlines are far less helpful to her self promotion:
JK Rowling appears very desperate for anyone to recommend her these days.
An example of JK Rowling's behaviour in association with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne is associated to her preoccupation with re-tweeting/X posting tweets/X posts by one Masih Alinejad, an Iranian womans' rights worker who is shown below (a photo taken from this activist's Twitter/X page).
In continually posting and referencing this woman, JKRowling alludes to two photographs of Felicity Lowde as a child; the Cornwall photo of her wearing a sun hat on the beach (one of a number), and a photo of her wearing plaits.
The Cornwall seaside pictures of Felicity as achild, taken by her parents, may be seen on Felicity Lowde's Flickr photography page. They are nothing to do with the intruder Rachel McFadyen/Osborne or JK Rowling (or with Masih Alinejad).
JK Rowling's habit of doing this intrusive and unauthorised referencing is shared by Katie Hopkins, who published the following tweet/X post:
Another X post/tweet by Masih Alinejad is shown below.
JK Rowling's disposition to steal from others is now on the level of a chronic debilitating psychosis. On twitter/X she is frequently called 'deranged' by astonished readers. Over the past five or so years, a great many of JK Rowling's frequently changing profile pictures on her social media pages (particularly X/Twitter) have been imitations either of childhood pictures of Felicity’s family or aspects of Felicity’s creative work.
Guided by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, JK Rowling tried to pretend that a creative research blog written by Felicity in the early days of her research, in 2007, was written by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, and she continued in this obsessive vein to the point that Felicity had to download all the blog’s pages and ask the host site to remove it from the Internet altogether.
The above photo is one that JK Rowling put on her X/Twitter page at the same time as a tweet/X post stating (by strong insinuation) that it was an act of protest against Felicity's removal of the 2007 blog. JK Rowling claimed that the removal of the 2007 blog was a conspiracy against her and her group of associates and an affront to all women everywhere: guess who she got that melodramatic line from? The heavily coloured and filtered photo (shown above), which features JK Rowling wearing large swathes of make up was placed on Her Twitter/X page. It was designed to impersonate and reflect the colours of a picture of a rose which Felicity Lowde had placed on her 2007 blog. Felicity had to remove the 2007 blog from the Internet due to JK Rowling's incessant behaviours.
'Them' magazine writers accuse JK Rowling of 'Using vocational causes she hijacks as an excuse for the expression of hatred'.
JK Rowling has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. She has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. She has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which she obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. She has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. She has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Stephen Fry
Stephen Fry, apparently for personal gain, was recruited into the group of celebrities by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. and her close friend Hugh Grant. He has been falsifying Felicity's creative work and her family history and background alongside Rachel McFadyen/Osborne while promoting himself. Very despicable behaviour.
Stephen Fry has no right to try to steal any aspect of Felicity's creative work or any other copyright material. He has no collude with Rachel Osborne/McFadyen's profiteering from her burglaries of Felicity's home(s), nor with her stalking of Felicity, nor with her hacking into Felicity's phones and computers.
Stephen Fry, who was convicted in court of fraud by Indentity Theft in the distant past, has no right to steal any aspect of Felicity Lowde’s creative work or her family records, or any other copyright material.
Stephen Fry has frequently included unauthorised references to Felicity’s creative work, life and family in obsessional tweets/X posts and various other media outlets. He frequently alludes to the stolen poor quality copies of Felicity Lowde’s parents photographs. He has arrogantly persisted in this activity despite objection and legal notices.
Stephen Fry's virulent abuse of Felicity's and the latter's whole family is as frequent as his activity in respect of theft, fraud and dishonesty and undoubtedly derives from his relationship with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, who brings out the worst in him (which was nit hard to find).
Stephen Fry has come under serious criticism for his solidarity with the genocidal state of Israel.
Stephen Fry is has a widely publicised criminal conviction for Identity theft, fraud and dishonesty. He is also a known plagiarist, who has been imposing himself onto Felicity’s work and family/ancestral record while making false claims about his own family and ancestry. In conjunction with other so-called celebrities and personalities mentioned on this page, Stephen Fry has been helping himself to Felicity’s family records and ancestry history and pass some of it off as his own. Theft plain and simple.
A notorious bully, Stephen Fry will try to convince his victims that he will crush them in court. Because he has a criminal conviction for dishonesty, officially no Courtroom can believe as word he says.
Stephen Fry and his publicity agents promote lies.
Stephen Fry is a publicity obsessive, not least because of the amount of covering up he has to do.
Recently Stephen Fry has been recently making adverts for Sainsburys.
Felicity has not given Stephen Fry permission to have anything to do with her and her creative work. Now would she ever.
One of the Wikipedia sites reports Stephen Fry as having been sexually abused as a child. ‘In an interview for British TV, in 2007, Fry stated that he was seduced by an older homosexual when he was a child. On the new More 4 program Shrink Rap, Fry said that the incident had taken place between him and a sixth former during his first year at boarding school, when he would have been aged 11-13. This is an example of the classic pattern of CSA > homosexuality > CSA > homosexuality.’ It is telling and alarming that Stephen Fry used the word ‘seduce’ in the context.
Stephen Fry’s relationship with his “husband” Eliott Spencer has elicited a wide range of reactions. In an article 'Media Obsesses over Age Difference Between Stephen Fry and New Fiance': ‘American publications also played up the age difference. Us Weekly referred to Spencer as Fry’s “much younger lover,” and noted that “age is just a number to British comedian Stephen Fry” in its Facebook post. Comments on this post were overwhelmingly negative, with commenters noting that Fry looked like a “grandfather,” a “pedophile” a “dirty old man,” and a “pervert.” ‘
‘Stephen Fry faced a furious backlash last night after attacking the country’s most high-profile police inquiry into historic sex abuse while hosting a fundraiser. The comedian shocked guests at the party last week when he blasted Operation Yewtree which has led to less than half of suspects being convicted. The TV presenter is believed to be angry over the treatment of his friend DJ Paul Gambaccini, 64, who remains on bail after his arrest by police investigating claims of historic sex offences. But child protection campaigner Peter Saunders said Fry was ‘simply wrong’. ‘
Reported in the Independent Newspaper, Stephen Fry wrote a pedophile play which got him into a lot of trouble: ‘Stephen Fry has been accused of “promoting paedophilia” by giving his blessing to an Edinburgh Festival revival of his award-winning play about an affair between a teacher and an under-age schoolboy. ..Now a row has broken out over plans by an acclaimed young company to revive the play, which tells of the homosexual relationship between a Latin master and his 13-year-old pupil. The play opens as part of the Fringe on Friday. The protests have been led by James Gilchrist, a local Conservative councillor who branded the play “smut” and dismissed Fry’s contribution to the theatre as something that “could be written on the back of a postage stamp”… Mr Gilchrist, who has reluctantly accepted an invitation to watch the play and take part in a post-show panel discussion, maintains that he is unimpressed by the company’s arguments. “I find it extraordinary that a subject as sensitive as paedophilia can be seen as art or entertainment,” he said. “It doesn’t sound like it is giving people a warning about its subject – it seems to be promoting it.” ‘ Stephen Fry can still be prosecuted over promoting paedophilia, the BBC excusing him over it is completely irrelevant.
A report on Stephen Fry by the Irish Journal: ‘ANOTHER WEEK, ANOTHER dull rant from thesaurus-clutching television personality Stephen Fry. Fry mysteriously maintains the reputation of a charming intellectual in the UK.. This time, however, the remarks were not just silly, outdated and indicative of someone whose politics were no longer developing. He said a disturbing and deeply unkind thing, and it deserves highlighting and round condemnation. Speaking to US TV show The Rubin Report about the idea of safe spaces on campuses and trigger warnings to mark sensitive content, Fry said: “There are many great plays which contain rapes, and the word rape now is even considered a rape. “They’re terrible things and they have to be thought about, clearly, but if you say you can’t watch this play, you can’t watch Titus Andronicus, you can’t read it in an English class, or you can’t watch Macbeth because it’s got children being killed in it, it might trigger something when you were young that upset you once, because uncle touched you in a nasty place, well I’m sorry. “It’s a great shame and we’re all very sorry that your uncle touched you in that nasty place – you get some of my sympathy – but your self pity gets none of my sympathy. “Self pity is the ugliest emotion in humanity. Get rid of it, because no one’s going to like you if you feel sorry for yourself. The irony is we’ll feel sorry for you, if you stop feeling sorry for yourself. Grow up.” Even before taking apart the core argument Fry is making here, we can address the grotesque flippancy of his tone. There is a strange sniggery dismissal, not dissimilar to Richard Dawkins’ assertion that “caning and mild paedophilia” which took place in the past can not be looked down upon in the same way one might do so day. What is it about this class of English men? Why the urge to trivialise the effects of such a horrifying and traumatic experience? Part of Fry’s good reputation is down to his commendable work as a mental health campaigner, using his own experience with bipolar disorder to spread awareness. He is the president of the mental health charity Mind. This only makes his remarks about child sexual abuse more disappointing and bewildering.’
Katie Hopkins put this foul tweet up (shown below) in liaison with Ben Goldsmith and Stephen Fry:
Stephen Fry is constantly updating his own personal references to child sex abuse (CSA), encouraging others to do the same. Appalling.
None of the X posts/tweets shown below were made by ourselves or by Felicity. They constitute public opinion.
In spite of Stephen Fry’s obsessional self promotion, there is widespread awareness of him as a criminally minded plagiarist and intellectual fraud, a spoofer, a pervert and a pernicious bully. One of many social media comments in this regard:
The tweet/X post below as published by us does not mean a twin reference. Why would it? Stephen Fry is not a twin and there are no twins in his family or ancestry.
Soon after Rachel McFadyen/Osborne had met Stephen Fry, poor quality copies of the quality photographs in Felicity's parents' photograph albums came into his hands. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne had taken photos of these photographs (either herself, or via her brother, or via a traceable private detective she hired) during one of her burglaries of Felicity's home in 2007 - 2008. Instead of informing Felicity that crimes were being committed against her, Stephen Fry decided to pass Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's photographed copies of the photographs as being pictures of himself or his own relations. He greedily and gullibly began pretending that they represented his own and his relations’ life story. So far, Stephen Fry has kept his activity in this regard to extensive private circulation, while at the same time, encouraged by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, gloating about it on his social media pages in various unsubtle formats. For a long time Stephen Fry refused to cease this activity.
The Stephen Fry tweet//X post examples shown below feature a black and white video which deliberately references Felicity’s parents’ photos of Felicity as a one year old, which Stephen Fry spent a long time falsely claiming were photos of himself. This identity theft and fraud activity of Stephen Fry is really despicable beyond words, even though he was levered into it by the scammer Rachel McFadyen/Osborne.
There is incidentally no reference to twins in our publishing of the black and white film clips shown below.
For a long time, Stephen Fry falsely claimed that Felicity’s Flickr photography page was owned by himself (with others). Just a part of this relentless fraud activity that the celebrities engaged in.
For a long time, a significant feature of all Stephen Fry’s referencing in his media appearances, tweets/X posts and videos, was plagiarising Felicity's creative history and History of Art research work which he constantly distorts. Stephen Fry's tweets/X posts, writings and videos were full of cliquey and very unsubtle coded referencing. Lead in a fool's dance by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, he even incorporated a foul, completely distorted sequence of unauthorised references to Felicity's creative work and family history into his stage speech at the Queen’s public Jubilee party at London.
Stephen Fry is obsessed with a) self promotion and b) aggressive homosexuality with fetishism, and he would constantly try to drag Felicity’s innocent creative work into his mire. No artist, painter or writer, should have to put up with him and his invasions.
The tweet or re-tweet examples from Stephen Fry’s Twitter/X account shown below are a deliberate attempt by Stephen Fry to maintain that Felicity’s Flickr photography page, which features many photo examples from her parents’ original photo albums, is a Flickr page owned and shared by him and the other celebrities mentioned on this page. Before Felicity protectively changed the Flickr account handle-title to her full name of F'elicity Jane Lowde', the handle-title used to be simply her initials fjl. The vulnerable nature of this fjl handle was seized upon by Rachel McFadyen and her associates. In their own writings, the arrogant celebrities distorted 'fjl' into various possibilities convenient to them such as “Fry, Lee (one of Patti Smith’s names) and Jones”.
This re-tweet/X post about the Stables Theatre (shown below) is another Stephen Fry allusion to Felicity’s Flickr photography account.
The association between love heart/human heart referencing and the Houses of Stuart and Bourbon is a part of Felicity’s original work, which Stephen Fry doesn't have authority to plagiarise. Likewise the secret letters theme, also an aspect of Felicity’s original creative work.
Stephen Fry has often sought to promote a false claim that photos featuring on Felicity’s Flickr photography pages, her parents' photos of their honeymoon in Greece, are pictures of his (falsely claimed) secret royal relations in Africa. This false claim of his, encouraged by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, is nonsense, but as explained, it's a kind of nonsense that holds the group of celebrities/well known personalities together. Encouraged by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and Hugh Grant, these kind of false stories have been maintained by them all, long after they're being confronted with extensive evidence contradicting the shabby scam.
Celebrities were goaded into their actions by the avaricious hacker Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and lead along by her irrational and predatory hatred of Felicity. They were goaded by Rachel's claims to be a 'bomb survivor', which they will have been persuaded to think made them look dignified. (It's not rocket science though is it, to work out that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's claims to have been in the carriage that was bombed on 7/7 2005 are an obvious scam.) Taking sensible precautions before you sign up with someone isn't rocket science either.
This tweet/X post example posted by Stephen Fry (shown below) is a clear allusion to a photo on one of Felicity's Flickr photography pages. The photo features what is in fact a car hired in Greece by Felicity’s parents in 1964. In Stephen Fry’s Twitter/X post (one of many on the theme) he is trying to make said car look like a car hired in Africa by people who were nothing to do with Felicity's parents. Stephen Fry distorts the true interpretation of the original photograph (which belonged to Felicity's late parents) alongside foul referencing to prunes, flatulence; his anus, in other words. Even if meant as a grotesque joke, Stephen Fry’s behaviour is really disgusting!
Stephen Fry’s preoccupation with stealing Felicity’s creative work seems to be a part of his desire to dominate literature and art commentary in respect of the eighteenth and nineteenth century era. All he has ever really achieved though, in respect of this historical era, is a bad and inaccurate film on Oscar Wilde. Like Hugh Grant, Stephen Fry arrogantly and deludedly esteems himself to be an authority on Stuarts and Scotland, and on persecuted nineteenth century artistic groups. He seems to think that this gives him the right to barge in and boot everyone else out of the way. He is self important and delusional.
In this tweet (shown below), Stephen Fry dresses in a shirt designed to convey colours in photographs featuring on Felicity’s Flickr photography page (the page featuring photos of her parents' honeymoon). The shirt has check patterns in a style similar to check patterns featuring on a dress Felicity is wearing in photos of her when she was aged one. In the background (in this Stephen Fry tweet) are two similar books, designed to reference twins, a theme Stephen Fry stole from Felicity’s creative work.
Most Doctors would be very unlikely to say that Stephen Fry’s prostrate cancer connects him to high placed homosexual aristocrats. Nonetheless, Stephen Fry was/is convinced of this theory, which he obtained from Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. She seems to have persuaded him that he and various aristocrats were gay, had prostate cancer, and are therefore related. He constantly inferred this fraudulent nonsense with offensive lewd X posts/tweets like this one, (referring to testicular cancer on this occasion):
This tweet/X post by Stephen Fry is horrible, awful for Felicity to have to view (below); a tweet containing a video he made, featuring himself talking about ‘Missing Pieces theatre’. Here Stephen Fry deliberately uses the ‘Missing Pieces’ title as a direct reference to a photo of Felicity age one in which she is ripping up some papers in the living room of her childhood home. While making his awful videos, Stephen Fry often makes a ‘touching his nose;’ sign. The sign, and his face, are both hideous. He looks like a fool, as well as a creepy back street Victorian conman.
During Christmas 2023, Stephen Fry broadcast what he called an ‘Alternative Christmas Message.’ It was not well received; viewers were all disgusted. Some example responses from members of the public (none of these X posts/Tweets were posted by ourselves or by Felicity, they are postings by members of the public).
(None of the following X posts/Tweets were posted by ourselves or by Felicity).
Tweets/X posts from David Baddiel are always very focused on himself. What other people have to say about him is more interesting. Most people think David Baddiel is a vile racist fraudster basically.
Stephen Fry and his associates have no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. They have no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. They have no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which they obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. They have no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. They have no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Bernard Fontana
A man named Bernard Fontana, C.E.O. of E.D.F. (Electricite de France), formerly C.E.O. of a heavy industry company named Framatome, is nuisance who Rachel McFadyen Osborne approached in the context of her stalking and hacking campaign against Felicity.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne got hold of Bernard Fontana through stalking and hacking Felicity. Bernard Fontana is a man Felicity dated over thirty-seven years ago when she was in France, which is the last time she saw him, although they have spoken briefly since. Felicity has not invited Bernard Fontana back into her life.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne continually appeals to Bernard Fontana while vaunting her sexuality in a weird manner. She has hacked his phones and computers on numerous occasions. Vaunting her false victims status and her pole dancing videos, she managed to get him to go along with her falsification of the true interpretation of Felicity's parents' personal photographs, Felicity's personal photographs and sensitive property she stole from Felicity's home, even though he knew perfectly well that her story was false.
Bernard Fontana took Rachel McFadyen/Osborne up on her criminal scams, to his lasting shame. He has behaved like a fool and now reaps the consequences.
The appeal of going about with a celebrity group (however awful) who were promising to promote a false version of his life story and background designed by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne was too much for Bernard Fontana, and he went along with them. Offers of money and status can make people who should know better, do some really stupid things.
The celebrity group recruited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne have shown themselves keen on encouraging Bernard Fontana, because he is French. They feel he will help them look as if they know what they’re talking about where French aristocracy is concerned. In fact Bernard Fontana knows nothing about French aristocracy; (why would he? Because he is French?) So that was the end of that silly idea.
Bernard Fontana has a half Polish, half English ex-wife named Anna Fontana, who had two of his children, Marie and Thomas, and she is nothing to do with any French or Polish aristocracy either. Neither are the children. Neither Bernard nor Anna Fontana are in any way related to Felicity Lowde or her creative History of Art research work.
At one stage, JK Rowling developed a bizarre obsession with Bernard Fontana, and was constantly signalling to him with rowdy lewd references that she printed on her X/Twitter page and other social media outlets. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne keeps going with hers.
Bernard Fontana happens to have been born to a French white caucasian couple in Madagascar, Africa.
One of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's techniques in her scam against Felicity is to make out that royal characters in her research are black African in origin. While black and white skins are both beautiful things, black African origin does not feature in the royal historical lives that Felicity has researched and discovered. Katie Hopkins also employs this technique in her scam which she runs parallel to that of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne (having played copycat to it). The reason these two women have taken this faulty theme is that they think it's a good way to make them look as if the are not racist and prejudiced against African and Arab people. Which as everyone know, they are.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has used her faulty theme in this regard to appeal to both Bernard Fontana and Lenny Henry, as a part of her stalking and sabotage campaign against Felicity.
Bernard Fontana has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. He has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. He has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. He has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. He has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Lenny Henry
Goaded by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, Lenny Henry for a long time pushed the idea that characters in Felicity Lowde’s creative History of Art and historical case story work should be black and related to both him and Jamaica in some way - even though historical facts convey the contrary quite simply.
If a person is racist in one way, they are usually racist in another.
Lenny Henry (Lenworth Henry) is an anti-white racist and so-called comedian who lost favour with the public about a decade ago consequent to his juxtaposition of 'black lives matter' with his racist media agendas.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and Katie Hopkins seek to get out of the widely publicised charges of racism against them (particularly anti-Arab racism) by associating with Lenny Henry. Both have often exchanged communications about aspects to their theft of Felicity’s creative work and the story of Felicity's family’s record and identity together.
Lenny Henry developed a plagiarism/theft attack on Felicity’s creative work comprised of a false assertion that certain characters in the story that Felicity is putting together (based on her study of case history and History of Art) correspond to a fraudulent version of his own ancestry which they have devised in association with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. Encouraged by the most persistent members of the group of the group of celebrities recruited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, Lenny Henry goes out of his way to falsify Felicity's work and her family record.
While preoccupied on Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's plans to steal Felicity's creative work on Felicity’s creative work, Lenny Henry developed the bizarre, arrogant idea that everything Felicity does would be justified if only she would say that a) all the historical personalities she covers in her work dating back to the seventeenth century come from Jamaica in some way b) they’re all related to him. As it happen they don't come from Jamaica and of course they aren’t related to Lenny Henry. Or Rachel McFadyen or Katie Hopkins.
And Felicity simply can’t say, for example, that because a statue at Versailles of one of the seventeenth century courtiers is made from dark bronze it means that the contemporaneous artist’s model was black.
Having liaised with Rachel Lenny Henry is very persistent with his false claim to be associated to Felicity’s creative work, her family, her ancestry and the copies of photos stolen from her parents’ photograph albums.
Lenny Henry subscribes to the McFadyen born siblings' scam constructs, and on this basis he seems to feel that he can mistreat the real Felicity Jane Lowde/Felicity Lowde as much as he likes. Pushed along by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, he has stolen from the real Felicity constantly, abusing her whenever she pointed out that her identity is her own, and that she has Human Rights. On his X/Twitter page, Lenny Henry would publish a constant stream of self promoting posts which effectively make false claims based on unauthorised referencing to Felicity’s work. There is in fact absolutely no connection between Lenny Henry and Felicity’s parents or any member of her childhood family. Just as there isn't any connection between Felicity and the other celebrity figures mentioned on this page.
In the following X post/tweet Lenny Henry refers to a singer Felicity likes, Kirsty McColl, whose father Ewan McColl, Felicity has creatively suggested, knew about certain aspects to the historical case story that she is working on.
As another example of Lenny Henry's racist dogma, the socalled comedian posted this X post/Tweet:
Like the other celebrities mentioned on this page, Lenny Henry frequently posts X posts/tweets which subtly (or unsubtly!) reference the names of members of people in Felicity’s family and ancestry. He focuses on names in Felicity's ancestry. Such as (for example) the name Woodward, which is the maiden name of Felicity’s maternal grandmother who both Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and Katie Hopkins falsely claim to be related to.
Ben and Jemima Goldsmith
For a considerable time, financier Ben Goldsmith, son of the late James Goldsmith and brother of Tory minister Zac Goldsmith, went along with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's approaches in the context of her campaigns against Felicity. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne began recruiting Ben to her campaign against Felicity in 2017. At the same time, Ben was approached by Katie Hopkins, to the same effect; encouraging him in a hate campaign against Felicity.
Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and Katie Hopkins (with whom Ben Goldsmith also liaises), pride themselves on being as bitchy and nasty as they can be, preening themselves as they harm women and gloating about womens' difficulties. They both have an obvious problem with other women, whom they constantly hate on.
We have observed that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, in her bad-natured watching of Felicity all the time, always approaches people who draw near to Felicity for a while and showi her friendship. Even it is just a fleeting, trivial moment on the Internet, such as occurred between Felicity and Ben in 2017. For over twenty years, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne has shown that she cannot stand the sight of anyone offering friendship or assistance to Felicity in any walk of life, and if ever she sees Felicity being shown friendship and support, or even if she sees Felicity talking with someone who might show her friendship and support, she goes to sabotage it in any way she can.
(Katie Hopkins' approaches to Ben Goldsmith as of 2017 and his responses to them are talked of on another page in this blog).
The reason Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and her brother Andrew McFadyen have shown an interest in Ben Goldsmith and his sister is their money. The Goldsmiths own a vast amount of it, which is managed by Ben Goldsmith, it's no secret.
Ben and Jemima both vaunt their money in a friendly social manner, often acting towards people as though they feel their causes are worth giving to, which unfortunately makes then fertile targets for scammers like the McFadyen/Osborne's and the Hopkins.
Ben Goldsmith, environmentalist, would often fill his tweets/X posts with references to 'The Victorian holocaust'. For example, he would, unauthorised, combine this with referencing to the Scottish Highlands, relating to a theme in Felicity Lowde's creative work, the lost Stuart Bourbon descendants. While these tweets/X posts are not offensive in themselves, they were not inspired or authorised by Felicity and, as with the other celebrities' Internet behaviour, are obviously totally unacceptable to her if conducted in liaison with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne or Katie Hopkins.
The above is just one example of a great many. Some are explored on the page about Katie Hopkins' abuses.
In his affairs Ben Goldsmith often employs an aggressive and corrupt barrister named Henry Mainwaring of TGB Barristers who spends a lot of his time harassing and stalking his targets and effectively defrauding them out of justice.
Newspaper articles about the activity of the notorious duo Ben Goldsmith and Henry Mainwaring may be read HERE and HERE and HERE (for example.) Neither of them have ever challenged the veracity of these linked newspaper articles.
There are serious concerns about the extent of Ben Goldsmith’s disgraceful personal and financial support of the state of Israel. Newspaper articles on this matter may be read HERE and HERE (for example).
At the same time, we appreciate that Ben Goldsmith has been through terrible personal tragedy which he handles very well.
The barrister Henry Mainwaring of tgbbarristers has been reported to the Bar Standards Board (as of June 2024) who are conducting an investigation into his improper and unlawful conduct. We believe there is significant evidence of his taking advantage of Ben Goldsmith, for money.
Ben Goldsmith is constantly verbally attacking the most vulnerable civilian Palestinians and making false claims against those who argue for their defence. His behaviour in this regard is utterly appalling and it contravention of recent decisions by the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice.
Another member of the celebrity group associated with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne is Paul McCartney’s daughter Stella McCartney who lives in Ben Goldsmith’s country home village of Witham Friary in Somerset. One of Stella’s McCartney brothers is named Louis, which apparently relates to Paul McCartney’s 1970s fandom of Scottish and French aristocracy. There is no connection between the McCartneys and any Scottish or French aristocracy (and he does not appear to have ever said there is). There was a craze on the subject among celebrities in the 1970s.
A regular supporter of Ben Goldsmith and Ralph Fiennes is the actor Leonardo DiCaprio, on account of their mutual involvement in environmental issues. Leonardo DiCaprio is a really superb actor, and it’s a shame he compromised himself with this off set activity just for the sake of keeping up with these pointless people.
Jemima Goldsmith-Khan frequently normalises her brother Ben Goldsmith’s dreadful behaviour. towards the Palestinians She often appears to be on a mission to do so. This normalising behaviour, together with her constant promotion of both sides of wars whenever they occur, is often presented by her as her unique gift for identifying with everyone whatever their personal circumstances. It's not a PR success in our view.
Undoubtedly, Jemima Goldsmith-Khan was approached by Hugh Grant with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne when invited to participate in the campaigns against Felicity organised by the latter.
Most educated people are not deceived by Jemima Goldsmith/Kahn’s prattle and stooging; nothing the Goldsmith family men do is ever further than one step away from their own personal financial gain.
As advocates of the Rothschild Banking Dynasty and its motives and aims , Zac Goldsmith and Ben Goldsmith call shots in the British Tory party on a permanent basis.
Ben and Zac Goldsmith have frequently conveyed that 'Gaza should be flattened by the Israel's military'. Their remarks were reported in the mainstream newspapers; Jemima Goldsmith-Khan instantly went to work trying to convey that Ben and Zac Goldsmith didn't really mean exactly what they said.
In fact they meant exactly what they said, as Jemima perfectly well knows.
In 2015 -2016, Zac Goldsmith, who often jokingly calls his brother Ben “the Jewish one”, ran a “dog-whistle” campaign to be Lord Mayor of London as the Tory Party Candidate. The campaign focused almost solely on attacking his opponent Sadiq Khan as a Muslim while encouraging the public to believe that this fact would enable acts of terrorism in the city. Blatant racism.
Zac Goldsmith’s mayoral Campaign was financed by Cavamont Holdings.
From an article by The Times of Israel published at that time (photo below):
In the Independent Newspaper Jemima Goldsmith/Khan is quoted as saying: “I have Muslim and Jewish Family: I want to talk about Antisemitism and Islamophobia.” Expressly stated by her in the context of Israel’s long term, ongoing genocidal assault on Gaza, this is really like her saying, “I have diversity in my extremely wealthy family, so I want to talk about Gaza and the day I stubbed my toe, I blubbed about it for ages".
Jemima Goldsmith'Khan's other associates:
James Goldsmith, Zionist, Pioneer of Brexit and extremely wealthy businessman and financier (deceased). Annabel Vane Tempest–Stewart/Goldsmith, Lady Londonderry. Frank Zacharias Robin Goldsmith, Baron Goldsmith of Richmond Park (peerage created by Boris Johnson), financier, member of the Tory Party, Minister of State for Overseas Territories, Commonwealth, Energy, Climate and Environment under Prime Minister Rishi Sunak until June 2023. Jointly in charge of the family’s money, an estimated large portion of the worlds wealth (managed by Ben Goldsmith). Ben Goldsmith, financier and fanatical Zionist; Israel supporter, Israel investor and denier of the Gaza Holocaust. Imran Khan, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, who has been jailed in Pakistan on various serious corruption charges.
Jemima Goldsmith/Khan is a close associate of the prat Brendan Cox.
There is also a suggestion that Jemima Khan’s Instinct Productions have been liaising with ITV/ITVX and theBBC for the purposes of a) the propagandist documentary about Gaza and Israel and b) a film stealing and distorting Felicity’s creative work. The media outlets the group appear to have selected are immoral in every way. These particular outletrs are known to break all ethical rules and tell continuous lies. Felicity has herself conveyed that she denies permission to these media outlets (and to any and all others colluding), to publish or broadcast anything to do with her creative case work, her history of art work or her family and her family record.
Although it doesn't necessarily mean that they are colluding with the state of Israel, there is clearly room to suggest that celebrities/well known personalities recruited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, or people who are connected to that group, are often associated to the criminal state of Israel which has been charged with genocide at the Hague, in one way or another. This should be enough to cause any author and artist serious concern. Felicity has a perfect right to refuse association to the genocide-accused state of Israel.
Ben and Jemima Goldsmith and their associates have no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. They have no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. They have no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which they obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. They have no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. They have no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Russell Brand
Russell Brand is another celebrity who Rachel McFadyen/Osborne enlisted into her campaigns against Felicity. Rachel McFadyen/Osborne came recommended to Russell Osborne through Jemima Goldsmith-Khan. Russell Brand and Jemima Khan were an item in 2013. Ben Goldsmith and his brother Zac called the relationship a 'tiger ride' for Jemima when it was over.
As with the other celebrities on this page, Felicity does not permit Russell Brand to have anything to do with her personal and family record, her personal and family photographs, or her creative work.
For a long time Russell Brand joined in with the other celebrities on this page in publishing impersonations of Felicity's parents' and her own personal photographs, and impersonations of art works that Felicity uses in her creative work. He has imposed himself onto their true story without permission from Felicity.
As of July 2026 Russell Brand is going on rial for multiple counts of rape. Womens' allegations him were investigated in a Channel 4 documentary on Dispatches.
Via her solicited association with JK Rowling and Stephen Fry, Rachel McFadyen/Osborne solicited the actor Ralph Fiennes, and recruited him to her side in her hateful campaigns against Felicity. The association lasted for quite a while. In keeping with the actions of the celebrity clique, this actor exploited media outlets, media interviews, press interviews and various appearances to continually put forward an entirely distorted version of Felicity's family record, ancestry and creative work, a version that corresponded with the schemes of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. It was obvious that he was in thrall to both Rachel McFadyen/Osborne and JK Rowling, avaricious and foolish woman that the latter she is. Ralph Fiennes displayed himself as a horribly self absorbed and self promoting person.
A picture of Ralph Fiennes:
Tracy-Ann Oberman frequently appeals to Ralph Fiennes on the Internet, and he reciprocates. An example below: by way of a certain gesture, placing their hands crossed over their chest in a particular way, which seems to be a cliquey reference between the two of them. the two might have been more self aware: given Ralph Fiennes disposition, and Tracy Ann's own disposition and her tendency to grovel to this actor, there were at the time concerns that the two are both imitating Adolf Hitler (as he appears making this gesture in various speeches).
In fact they are more likely to be arrogantly hijacking Felicity's creative historical work which involves aristocrat's tombs in famous world places.
Ralph Fiennes making the same gesture in an interview (December 2024), shown below. He is an actor, he knows the value of carefully timed, specific gesture. In this interview series with Edward Berger in respect of the film Conclave (published on Youtube), Ralph Fiennes specifically appealed to Tracy-Ann Oberman while distancing himself from Felicity's truthful claims about her creative work. Despicable.
It is wholly inappropriate that Felicity or anybody else should be burdened by such continual vile nuisance.
It is consistently apparent that celebrities of Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's selection, whom she succeed (for a long while) in recruiting to her side, saw an association with her as something that would promote them in society. Are they so reputationally bankrupt? Or is it about the platform? Say you're a 'bomb survivor' and you can take most people for fools.
Ralph Fiennes has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. He has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. He has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. He has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. He has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
More on Hugh Grant
This
man has no regard for the poor, the oppressed, the falsely accused and scapegoated, the voiceless, the victimised, those
with no status in the world, from whom everything has been taken away.
None whatever. Just his vanity.
The actor Hugh Grant has been very influenced by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. He conspicuously rejects really beautiful experiential research discoveries made by Felicity, although she has never asked him for anything, and he often appears to be doing this out of sheer spite. Whenever Felicity demonstrates her authenticity or a real research talent he rallies people to attack her for no reason.
Hugh Grant's shown how he can be a malicious man. Persecution, slander and libel, bullying, invasion of privacy and psychological abuse are a regular activity with him alongside Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, and perjury is nothing to him so long as he gets his own way.
The actor Hugh Grant is registered with many advisory websites such as the Celebrity Crime Museum and the East Alcatraz page.
When alongside Rachel McFadyen/Osborne, the actor Hugh Grant has appeared in his element when creating division between groups of people or individuals or causing trouble by spreading false reports and instigating antagonism. Reputedly, he has numerous networks of his own which he exploits to attack the vulnerable as well as the weighty. He takes out private detectives on people for the slightest thing. His disposition for criticising other people’s finances while hiding his own is frankly dodgy. Hugh Grant systematically, repeatedly, falsely accuses people of murder and other very serious crimes.
And then there are the the real sexual offences.
Hugh Grant has been continually persecuted by the corrupt British media, which may well have weakened his mind. However, this doesn’t excuse him for perverse behaviours.
The actor
Hugh Grant has been repeatedly told that his claims (and constant dodgy ideas) about his ancestry expressed over the past decade are checked out and are frauds.
It is very unlikely that the 1995 Hugh Grant-Divine Brown occasion of 1995 is an isolated incidence. Statistically, Hugh Grant will have been involved in more incidences of soliciting prostitutes before that, and there may have been incidences starting up again a while after 1995.
The actor Hugh Grant's wife Anna Eberstein comes across as an ‘enabler.’ She is also a noticeably a very silent person, while described in some Internet places as 'nearly as nasty as he is'.
The actor Hugh Grant’s known prostitution exploits. The 1995 prostitute was named Estella Marie Thompson; her street name was Divine Brown. Hugh Grant used the pseudonym Lewis (nothing to do with anything in Felicity's case work) for soliciting prostitutes (just one aspect of the Hugh Grant-Divine Brown 1995 encounter that demonstrates his experience in soliciting prostitutes before 1995.
In recent articles Hugh Grant has claimed that he was “in a bad mood” when he went looking for a prostitute and picked up Divine Brown (Estella Marie Thompson).
Model and actress Elizabeth Hurley‘s face caught by photographers just after the 1995 Divine Brown incidence. Says it all.
The actor Hugh Grant has offended asian groups who alledge his exploitation of asian women.
There’s a striking contrast between the part Hugh Grant played in the 2003 clique film Love Actually and his actual behaviour which at times amounts to support of Israel and the ex President Biden aka ‘Genocide Joe.’ (‘Genocide Joe’ earned his nickname from his extensive and continuous supply of arms to Israel used for Israel’s genocide on Gaza and his incitement to genocide).
Hugh Grant’s wife Anna Eberstein is part Jewish, and she is a part of a non identical male–female set of twins. Anna Ebersteins’ genetics are unconnected to Felicity’s creative case story work as it happens. There is no Stuart or Bourbon ancestry in her, nor any aristocracy. However, this does not stop Hugh Grant continually insisting to Rachel McFadyen/Osborne that she ought to be referenced in Felicity's creative work.
Stephen Fry, Hugh Grant and Katie Hopkins have been supported in their foul actions by unpopular public personality John Cleese, another (less prominent) member of the celebrity/high profile journalists’ fraudsters group. John Cleese is regularly accused of being an extreme right wingnut and a publicity obsessive keen to silence critics and an unfunny sour face who’s lost the plot, and is married to a woman less than half his age. These type of public comments about him have increased as a result of various incidences; ‘Campaigner from notorious Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) attends meeting chaired by Comedian John Cleese’, for example. There are also diverse reports of the PIE campaigner, Tom O’Caroll, (who has a string of sex offences on his record) and John Cleese going to view the Houses of Parliament together.
In younger days John Cleese gained a reputation as a funnyman on the basis of talented comic scripts mostly written by his wife Connie, whom the comedian almost never acknowledges.
Stephen Fry and John Cleese “decided between them” that artists from the eighteenth to the twentieth century never intended anything but a reference to a frying pan whenever they painted a fish and thus Stephen Fry is the centre of everything.
The actor Hugh Grant’s brother, James “Jamie” Grant, is Global Chairman of Investment Banking at JP Morgan. He also advertises as head of Retail Investment Banking coverage at J.P. Morgan & Co. in New York. J.P. Morgan & Co is a subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase.
An article by Eyes on the Ties reports on genocide weapons CEOs and shareholder companies who are complicit in financing weapons for Israel’s genocide on Gaza.
The report was circulated by the news outlet Common Dreams.
JP Morgan Chase is cited in the article as being a top contributor to arms for genocide.
On November 21st 2023, Washington Square News pubished an article about protests against JP Morgan Chase supplying finance for arms to Israel.
Articles also place Hugh Grant's brother Jamie at the centre of a ‘Rothschild and Cadbury buffet banker circle’.
According to Clutchpoints, Hugh Grant’s personal Net Worth is now $150 Million (by latest reports). Which means it’s increased by about $90 Million over the last two years. Hugh Grant is apparently close with his brother Jamie.
According to its website publications, JP Morgan takes a significant interest in the activities of ex British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, a talentless establishment sociochopath who has been extensively criticised for his enthusiastic supply of lethal weapons to the genocidal state of Israel which have been used to kill the innocent, including children, in their tens of thousands.
An article by ‘Craig Murray titled Beware the Cult of Cadwalladr’ .
There is no connection between Felicity Lowde’s creative research work and the insalubrious characters who run and contribute to the far right political Campaign Againast Antisemitism organisation and its Internet pages. There is no connection between the insalubrious Campaign Against Antisemitism organisation's characters and Felicity's or her family's authentic photographs. None whatsoever.
Elizabeth Hurley
Elizabeth Hurley gives a nod to everything Hugh Grant does, however perverse. The dignity she showed in the distant past while he was engaging in his vile behaviour seems to have evaporated into thin air.
Elizabeth Hurley was invited to encourage Rachel McFadyen/Osborne in all her behaviours by Hugh Grant, and she took him up on the offer. Like the other celebrities on this page, Elizabeth Hurley is constantly demonstrating that she supports Rachel McFadyen/Osborne in respect of her false claims about photos that she obtained through burgling Felicity's house and through hacking Felicity's phones and computers.
Elizabeth Hurley frequently uses her Instagram page to taunt Felicity about the burglaries and hacking she has experienced. She does this by impersonating members of her family who appear in Felicity's and her parents' personal photographs and on social media and by impersonating figures in art work chosen by Felicity in the course of her history and History of Art research.
On her Instagram account Elizabeth Hurley often loudly plays music that Felicity's family members or their guardians have played on their social media pages; the reason she does this is that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne falsely claims that Felicity's parents' photographs and Felicity's personal photos belong to her and this kind of behaviour is Elizabeth's way of showing support. (As seen Rachel McFadyen organised and took numerous photographs of Felicity's and her family's photos and personal belongings while organising and participating burglaries on her home).
Elizabeth Hurley has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. She has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. She has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. She has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. She has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Carol Vorderman
Carol ’Vorders’ Vorderman who was presenter of the tacky TV program Countdown before Rachel Riley. Carol Vorderman appears to have no aristocracy in her background, French or English, Scottish or Irish. This person continually vaunts her ridiculous false claims. Carol Vorderman seems to be just as self absorbed and egotistical as the other members of the celebrity group recruited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. She was probably introduced to the group by Stephen Fry.
Carol Vorderman is very preoccupied with self promotion and spin, and is well known to tell ridiculous lies. For example, she is continually claiming to have never had breast augmentation operations.
There is no aristocracy, secret or otherwise, in her family or ancestry.
Carol Vorderman has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. She has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. She has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. She has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. She has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Patti Smith
Liaising with Ralph Fiennes and Rachel McFadyen, Patti Smith makes false claims about her family and ancestry. She continually seeks to dominate aspects of Felicity's creative work.
Patti Smith liases continually with Stephen Fry, JK Rowling and Ralph Fiennes. Patti Smith erects anonymous Ralph Fiennes fan pages and acts as his spokeman, and he seems to continually go along with this. Both Patti Smith and Ralph Fiennes continually broadcast a reverence for Patti Smith's one time lover Robert Maplethorpe.
A 2024 picture of Ralph Fiennes below.
Patti Smith is often described be people of the same age and younger as a ‘total parasite’. Patti Smith relies heavily on Stephen Fry’s supposed intelligence, by which she means his con artist expertise.
Patti Smith looks dreadful here. Pity the children.
Felicity has made it clear to Pati Smith that she will never have anything to do with her family history and creative work.
Patti Smith’s involvement with criminal obscenity and child sex abuse (CSA) goes way back, to her first long term partner Robert Mapplethorpe, a photographer, homosexual and paedophile who was into masochism, sadism and child sex abuse (CSA). Robert Mapplethorpe died of Aids age 42. ‘Indictment: Hamilton County grand jury accuses the Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center and its director, Dennis Barrie, of two misdemeanor counts each: pandering and using minors in pornography. Defendants: Dennis Barrie and the Cincinnati Contemporary Arts Center. In the spring of 1990, the Contemporary Arts Center (CAC) in Cincinnati, Ohio, held an exhibit of photographs by the late artist Robert Mapplethorpe. This exhibit titled, The Perfect Moment was controversial in nature from the very onset. There was a great deal of negative public reaction and an attempt to close the exhibit citing the Ohio obscenity statute, which makes it illegal for any person to “Promote, display or exhibit… any obscene material” Of the 175 Mapplethorpe pictures in the exhibit, 7 were extremely controversial making them the focus of the ensuring trial. Two of the pictures were of naked minors, with a “lewd exhibition or graphic focus on the genitals.” The other five objectionable pictures were of five men posing in unusual sadomasochistic poses.‘ ‘In the summer of 1989, a traveling solo exhibit by Mapplethorpe brought national attention to the issues of public funding for the arts, as well as questions of censorship and the obscene. The Corcoran Gallery of Artin Washington, D.C., had agreed to be one of the host museums for the tour. Mapplethorpe decided to show his latest series that he explored shortly before his death. Titled Robert Mapplethorpe: The Perfect Moment, the show included photographs from his X Portfolio, which featured images of urophagia gay BDSM and a self portrait with a bullwhip inserted in his (fill in the blank). It also featured photos of children with exposed genitals. The show was curated by Janet Kardon of the Institute of Contemporary Art (ICA)’. ‘Urophagia is the consumption of urine. Urine was used in several ancient cultures for various health, healing, and cosmetic purposes; urine drinking is still practiced today, though there is no proof of it providing health benefits. In extreme cases, people may drink urine if no other potable fluids are available, although numerous credible sources (including the US Army Field Manual) advise against it. Urine may also be consumed as a sexual activity in the context of the Urophagia definition’. ‘In 1998, the University of Central England was involved in a controversy when a library book by Mapplethorpe was confiscated. A final-year undergraduate student was writing a paper on the work of Robert Mapplethorpe and intended to illustrate the paper with a few photographs from Mapplethorpe, a book of the photographer’s work. She took the photographs to the local chemist to be developed and the chemist informed West Midlands Police because of the unusual nature of the images. The police confiscated the library book from the student and informed the university that two photographs in the book would have to be removed. If the university agreed to the removal (which it did not) the book would be returned. The two photographs, which were deemed possibly prosecutable as obscenity, were “Helmut and Brooks, NYC, 1978”, which shows anal fisting, and “Jim and Tom, Sausalito, 1977″, which is of a man clad in a dog collar, a leather mask and trousers, urinating into another man’s mouth.” After a delay of about six months, the affair came to an end when Peter Knight, the Vice-Chancellor of the university, was informed that no legal action would be taken. The book was returned to the university library without removal of the photos.. The 1986 solo exhibition “Black Males” and the subsequent book The Black Book sparked controversy for their depiction of black men. The images, erotic depictions of black men, were widely criticized for being exploitative. The work was largely phallocentric and sculptural, focusing on segments of the subject’s bodies. Criticism was the subject of a work by American conceptual artist Glenn Ligon, Notes on the Margins of the Black Book (1991–1993). Ligon juxtaposes Mapplethorpe’s 91 images of black men in the 1988 publication Black Book with critical texts and personal reactions about the work to complicate the racial undertones of the imagery. American poet and activist Essex Hemphill also expressed criticism in his anthology Brother to Brother (1991). Hemphill believed Mapplethorpe’s work displayed a lack of concern for gay black men, “except as sexual subjects." '
Patti Smith has often posted Instagram posts featuring Robert Mapplethorpe: shown in the screenshot above for example. Smith and her associates mentioned on this page have harassed Felicity Lowde with what they describes as their ‘piss and shit theme’.
Patti Smith doesn't exactly choose her acquaintances carefully.
Just vile, unworthy of any public platform.
A creepy corresponding tweet from Stephen Fry:
‘For years Patti Smith was an aggressively strange character with a bloated ego and an insatiable desire for attention. Then she married Fred Smith and became a demure, reclusive housewife. I guess that was what she wanted. After his death her need for attention returned and she’s always out and about promoting something and selling herself. Her book “Just Kids” is one of the most overrated, laughably pretentious pieces of garbage I’ve ever tried to read’.
‘Patti Smith is awful. Mick Jagger called her out in the 70s. She was a spoiled rich girl. Mick Jagger called her fake and a poser. Her only claim to fame was dating people that died young. She turned Robert Mapplethorpe gay. She would sponge off Mommy and Daddy and have them raise the kid she kept, after all she couldn’t be bothered keeping the kid she had when she was 21. All she did was scream into a microphone. Screaming isn’t singing. Smith is an epic fail. I love the way all her credits are “additional words by Patti Smith.” Meaning she didn’t even cowrite it, she probably just changed a few words around to get credit and money’.
‘See Mick’s comments about Patti Smith in the exchange below:
Q: Can you remember any of the New York bands like the Patti Smith Group? Do you like Patti?
JAGGER: “I think it’s crap! I think she’s so awful…she’s full of rubbish, she’s full of words and crap. I mean, she’s a poseur of the worst kind, intellectual bullshit, trying to be a street girl when she doesn’t seem to me to be one, I mean, everything…a useless guitar player, a bad singer, not attractive.” ‘
‘I respect Patti Smith for being Ugly‘, a chat thread on the Internet.
In contrast, ‘Patti Smith is overrated’, by a blogger. ‘I have heard her music and she is a terrible, terrible singer. On top of that, she seems mostly famous for covers. While she might be as ugly as Joe Cocker, her skills do not compare. I saw her on Leno (or Letterman, one of those shows) doing a Stone’s song and she just butchered it. It must have been Letterman’s, because she was in NYC for the Rock and Roll hall of fame. She was getting inducted, or inducting someone… who cares. Like Warhol, or Paris Hilton… she is the punk rock equivalent. She is famous for being famous. Lastly, look at that picture. I mean, I think it’s great she doesn’t feel obligated to buy into the patriarchal models of femininity and sexuality but dude… at least brush your fuckin’ hair’.
‘Patti Smith is completely overrated. Could not agree more. Right place, right time, I guess. I don’t know. Her popularity has always been a total mystery to me. I don’t care how she looked or what her hair looked like. Roy Orbison was as ugly as they come, but he’s a legend. (Couldn’t think of a female equivalent off the top of my head…) Musically, Patti Smith is not just overrated – she is absolutely awful… her music is rubbish’.
‘Yes. she is over rated. Actually she doesn`t even deserve a rating. There are musicians out there that are great that weren’t lucky enough to get on the trendy train like she did. I guess looking like mr. ed on a bad hair day with a record label to promote you and the media telling you if you don’t like her you’ll be branded uncool and stupid is what made her. It certainly wasn’t talent in any degree. Sings off kilter on purpose, looks hardscrabble on purpose, lyrics aren’t anything with a wow factor. Sounds like she’s just another fake hippie’.
‘First heard her read poetry at St. Marks’ church in the early/mid 70’s. Was underwhelmed. First heard her sing at either Max’s or cbgb shortly thereafter. Was bemused and grossed out. Last heard her perform at wollman skating rink in central park 1976(?). Thought she sucked. Haven’t changed my mind.’
‘Couldnt agree more. An untalented wannabee and total phoney hanger-on who long ago forgot that she was faking’.
‘I put her right next to Rihanna and Beck as the most overrated piece of garbage artists ever.. The real sad part is Patty Smyth gets overshadowed by Smith’s name almost..’
‘Because the Night is regarded as a classic. But it is just a terrible “cod rock” pile of cringeness that was probably written by Jim Steinman in his coffee break while working for that other talentless pile of blubber Marvin Meatloaf. Bonnie “Karioke Queen” Tyler should have done this, and I am sure that she probably did in “Cardiff Ex Miners and Wheeltappers Social Club” in between the bingo and the leek and marrow contest’.
‘Yes, overrated indeed. She is a farce, and people who buy into her would probably eat a deep fried turd if they were told it were cool to do so’.
A review of Patti Smith’s Horses album here. ‘I’m stopping short of saying that this is an awful album. I’ll just say it’s one of the most annoying albums that I know. ..On listening to Horses, it tasted more like stale bread made out of marshmallow. Not only that the songs are devoid of structure and meander aimlessly; they also sound like versions of early 1970s Lou Reed or David Bowie songs with merely updated lyrics and a female singer; a female singer who can’t really sing all that well and who has the annoying habit of intoning every note a half tone higher and then sliding down, resulting in a pretty monotonous drawl. Any person who can sit through the nine painful minutes of Birdland has my sincere respect, as I’d put it on top of my list of the most unlistenable songs ever recorded in the history of rock music‘.
Patti Smith Instagram post (screenshot shown below), in which Patti Smith puts up a picture of her younger self pestering some or other rocker for attention while pointing beyond him. She cropps this photo of her pointing beyond him to try and make it look as though she was pointing at a man's heart area (she never was). She puts this up beside a post of a black and white picture of the band Earth who are nothing to do with her (and neither is the black and white photo of them). Her behaviour is entirely fitting Mick Jagger’s descriptions of her alleged musical talent as a fake and a phoney here.
Patti Smith’s Instagram is choc a block with her arrogant distortions of Felicity’s creative work, her having participated in the celebrity group's behaviour with Rachel McFadyen/Osborne.
Patti Smith seems to be one of numerous ‘socalled celebrities’ who pay bots to follow them on social media.
Patti Smith frequently insinuates that Felicity’s flickr photography account is jointly owned by herself, Stephen Fry and others, which is an abject lie.
As explained, the gang of
journalist and celebrities mentioned on this page have
fabricated a whole non existent Felicity Lowde who they claim is their
relation.
There is in fact only one Felicity Jane Lowde/Felicity Lowde.
Celebrities/well known individuals involved in the abusive fraud and harassment campaign and its associated malicious activity are: Katie Hopkins, Ben Goldsmith, Stephen Fry, Hugh Grant, Elizabeth Hurley, Ralph Fiennes, JK Rowling, Lenny Henry, Piers Morgan, Nigel Farage, Rachel Riley, Tracy-Ann Oberman, Carol Vorderman, Jemima Goldsmith-Khan, Dawn French, Husam Zomlot, David Baddiel, Myriam Francois, Matt Lucas, Russell Brand, and others.
Patti Smith has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. She has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. She has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which she obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. She has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home.She has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Dawn French
Another member of the celebrity group selected by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne is Lenny Henry’s ex wife Dawn Roma French. Dawn French (sad to think she was once a funny women when working with Lenny Henry, gone are the days), bought Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's version of events hook, line and sinker. Consistent with complaints about her, Dawn French is extremely malicious in postings directed at Felicity. There is ugly and threatening vindictiveness and malice in Dawn Roma French’s trolling videos and posts, example shown below.
Screenshot examples of one of Dawn French’s menacing stalker videos
which she personally posts on her Instagram Account. In this video she sings (if you can call it singing) about “Pooey Vitton.’
In her video (screenshots above), Dawn French sings -or rather gruffly shouts very loudly - a version of the song 'Look at me' by Meghan Trainor.
'I could have my Gucci on
I could wear my Louis Vuitton
But even with nothin' on
Bet I made you look at me'
Dawn French shouts 'Look at me'.
As translated and rendered by self professed 'mad bitch' Dawn French, this song taunts Felicity for complaining about receiving so much vicious abuse from Rachel McFdyen/Osborne and her celebrity accoladers. According to Dawn French, Felicity's only been complaining in order to receive the worst kind of abusive attention and should therefore be subjected to the worst kind of abuse.
Dawn French has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. She has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. She has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which she obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. She has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. She has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Matt Lucas
Matt Lucas, supposed comedian whose self promotion the public seem tired of, is another member of the group of celebrities recruited by Rachel McFadyen/Osborne. He has also targeted Felicity in conjunction with the celebrities described on this page, with sequences of Tweets/X posts and other Internet posts and gestures designed to cause alarm and distress.
Matt Lucas has no right whatsoever to anything of Felicity's. He has no right to any aspect of her creative history and History of Art work. He has no right to use any of Felicity's parents' photographs or her own personal photographs which he obtained copies of via Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's burglaries and hacking of Felicity's phones and equipment. He has no right to Felicity's sensitive personal belongings that Rachel McFadyen/Osborne stole from Felicity's home. He has no right to harass Felicity at Rachel McFadyen/Osborne's bidding and on her say so.
Update ongoing.
Comments
Post a Comment